Re: [tcpdump-workers] Checksum

2006-03-15 Thread Rick Jones
And keep in mind that if you are tracing on a system with a NIC doing ChecKsum Offload the outbound traffic from that system will probably not have the checksum calculated yet since the NIC will be doing it... rick jones - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to u

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Checksum

2006-03-15 Thread santosh.soule
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luis Del Pino Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 2:42 PM To: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org Subject: [tcpdump-workers] Checksum When I capture an UDP datagram from a well-known source, Could the checksum

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Checksum

2006-03-15 Thread Guy Harris
Luis Del Pino wrote: When I capture an UDP datagram from a well-known source, Could the checksum be incorrect? Yes, if the packet was corrupted. (I assume you're capturing with libpcap.) do I have to calculate it? If you want to check whether the packet was corrupted, yes. See tcpdump's

Re: [tcpdump-workers] Checksum

2006-03-15 Thread Hannes Gredler
sure - it could be that the data got corrupted by transit nodes; Luis Del Pino wrote: When I capture an UDP datagram from a well-known source, Could the checksum be incorrect? do I have to calculate it? or How Could I ask other entity about it? Thanks - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit

[tcpdump-workers] Checksum

2006-03-15 Thread Luis Del Pino
When I capture an UDP datagram from a well-known source, Could the checksum be incorrect? do I have to calculate it? or How Could I ask other entity about it? Thanks - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.