[tcpdump-workers] [PATCH] DCCP support - revised

Guy, Please find attached a slightly revised patch to tidyup a bug with seqno/ackno processing. Regards, Ian On 06/09/05, Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guy, > > Comments inline. > > > "dh_end" still isn't being used, as per my original comment: > > > > > In addition, there are no

Re: [tcpdump-workers] CAN-2003-1029 CAN-2003-0989 etc.

Florian Weimer wrote: Have these vulnerabilities been fixed in the main tcpdump code? I can't answer about "etc." without knowing what's included in "etc." (is it all CVE items for tcpdump?), but the two you mention are, as far as I know, fixed in the top of the main and 0.9.x branches (I che

[tcpdump-workers] CAN-2003-1029 CAN-2003-0989 etc.

Have these vulnerabilities been fixed in the main tcpdump code? What would be a good way to get authoritative information on tcpdump vulnerabilities? (These two CVE names aren't the only ones...) - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.