Re: [tcpdump-workers] pcap_dump_file & CO

2005-06-06 Thread Fulvio Risso
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christian > Kreibich > Sent: lunedì 6 giugno 2005 23.33 > To: tcpdump workers > Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] pcap_dump_file & CO > > > Hi Loris, > > On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 10:10 -0700, Loris Degioanni wr

Re: [tcpdump-workers] pcap_dump_file & CO

2005-06-06 Thread Christian Kreibich
Hi Loris, On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 10:10 -0700, Loris Degioanni wrote: > Guy, > > Guy Harris wrote: > > > > However, it sounds as if that only applies if the DLL is using a > > different version, or different instance, of the C runtime: > > Yes, but this doesn't solve the problem. You just cannot

Re: [tcpdump-workers] any objection to -P flag -- exit after packet limit

2005-06-06 Thread mcr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > "Alexander" == Alexander Dupuy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I added the -P flag, which takes a positive number, and has >> tcpdump exit after capturing that many packets. Alexander> How, exactly, is this different from the existing -c Al

[tcpdump-workers] any objection to -P flag -- exit after packet limit

2005-06-06 Thread Alexander Dupuy
I added the -P flag, which takes a positive number, and has tcpdump exit after capturing that many packets. How, exactly, is this different from the existing -c "Exit after receiving count packets" option? I suppose that one of them might count packets on the interface before filtering, and