On Jun 3, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Loris Degioanni wrote:
Consistency of the API across different platforms, taking into
consideration that some of them could have serious rerstrictions,
is an advantage for everybody, developer's and maintainers. Not
only Chris Lightfoot. And has always been the
On Jun 3, 2005, at 10:40 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
As happens all too often, patches that add new APIs don't include a
patch to pcap.3.
Either that patch did, or I added it, as those routines *are*
documented in pcap.3.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to
Guy,
Guy Harris wrote:
Loris Degioanni wrote:
When were pcap_fopen_offline(), pcap_dump_fopen() and the other FILE
related functions introduced?
November 2004:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1051449&group_id=53067&atid=469577
We still don't export them in
Loris Degioanni wrote:
When were pcap_fopen_offline(), pcap_dump_fopen() and the other FILE
related functions introduced?
November 2004:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1051449&group_id=53067&atid=469577
We still don't export them in WinPcap, and
I don't s
Guy,
Guy Harris wrote:
On Jun 2, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
Here is a KB documenting it
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;94248
That's a bit nastier - not only can't a C runtime file handle (the file
descriptors returned by the UNIX-like _open() call
CVS log entries from 02.06.2005 (Thu) 09:07:03 - 03.06.2005 (Fri) 09:07:00 GMT
=
Summary by authors
=
Author: guy
File: htdocs/wpcap.html; Revisions: 1.5
Author: hannes
File: tcp
