On Dec 14, 2004, at 2:17 PM, Ariel Burbaickij wrote:
well, here I fear I will become slightly offtopic. I am not so much
concerned about tcpdump, I am concerned about [t]ethereal
as the application that uses libpcap (as tcpdump does), so far I have
failed trying to set any sctp filters there.
H
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:15:32 -0800, Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ariel Burbaickij wrote:
> > The second one,
>
> I.e., the answer to the question originally asked is "no, there are no
> plans to add support for SCTP to capture filters, because libpcap
> filters already supports SCTP", a
Ariel Burbaickij wrote:
The second one,
I.e., the answer to the question originally asked is "no, there are no
plans to add support for SCTP to capture filters, because libpcap
filters already supports SCTP", and the real question should've been
"are there any plans to support printing SCTP in t
Hello dear mailing list partcipants,
are there any plans to support
sctp for capture filters?
With Best Regards
Ariel Burbaickij
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
The second one, I guess the fact that there is protocol
descriminator can be found in IP header is somehow
almost common knowledge, isn't it. Accordingly, one
can do what you have suggested.
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:46:34 -0800, Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 04
aman Reddy wrote:
Well I have gone through the man page. I didn`t get the clear point. U mean
the length of the header is the sum of the lengths of the fields in the
header.
Then it should be 16 bytes(2,2,2,8,2) but when I captured the packet using
ethereal it is showing me 6 in the link-layer add
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 04:30:36PM +0100, Ariel Burbaickij wrote:
> Hello dear mailing list partcipants,
> are there any plans to support
> sctp for capture filters?
tcpdump -X -i ip proto sctp
Of course, if you mean dumping sctp traffic in a human-readable manner,
that is quite different.
BMS
