On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 04:37:41PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> Including such an argument at the time the new API is introduced
> obviously doesn't introduce compatibility issues for that API. :-)
> (I'm actually thinking of an attribute/value list for various open
> options in the API, so t
On Oct 18, 2004, at 3:04 PM, Alexander Dupuy wrote:
Guy Harris writes:
Unfortunately, given that, on systems with BPF, you cannot change the
buffer size after a BPF device has been bound to a network interface,
"pcap_setbuff()" is unimplementable on those systems, so it's not a
candidate for
Guy Harris writes:
Unfortunately, given that, on systems with BPF, you cannot change the
buffer size after a BPF device has been bound to a network interface,
"pcap_setbuff()" is unimplementable on those systems, so it's not a
candidate for libpcap.
I didn't realize it was possible to set the bu
