fullc0de wrote:
I want to use libpcap with non-promiscous mode. But I don't know
how to do.
"How" in what sense?
In the simple sense of "how do I make my program capture in
non-promiscuous mode", the answer is "pass 0 as the value of the
'promisc' flag when you call 'pcap_open_log()'".
-
This is
(Noise to defeat the duplicate-message detector for
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Guy Harris wrote:
This is probably a pointless optimization,
"This" referring not to Bruce's proposed change, but to my proposed
change to have one time stamp call per packet.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https:/
Hello~
I have a question. :-)
I want to use libpcap with non-promiscous mode. But I don't know
how to do. Please teach me~~..
--
/-\
| Have a Ggle Time~*|
\-/
-
This is the tcpdump-wo
On Sep 8, 2004, at 2:26 AM, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Here's a patch against 5.3 to add a per-instance switch which allows
the user to specify if captured packets should be timestamped (and,
if so, whether microtime() or the faster but less accurate
getmicrotime() call should be used).
This is probabl
Here's a patch against 5.3 to add a per-instance switch which allows
the user to specify if captured packets should be timestamped (and,
if so, whether microtime() or the faster but less accurate
getmicrotime() call should be used).
Comments/flames/etc to the usual...
BMS
Index: bpf.c
===
