On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 12:21:18PM +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
> I did some similar work for bpf & mmap with NetBSD.
Yes, I saw those. The guy doing the FreeBSD work appears to be claiming
that he dropped fewer packets with his mapped access, but that might
just be a result of not time-stamping pac
In some email I received from Guy Harris, sie wrote:
> Also, speaking of capture speed and memory-mapped devices, there was a
> freebsd-hackers thread discussing a netgraph module providing
> memory-mapped access to captured packets:
I did some similar work for bpf & mmap with NetBSD. See:
http:
Also, speaking of capture speed and memory-mapped devices, there was a
freebsd-hackers thread discussing a netgraph module providing
memory-mapped access to captured packets:
http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040614124708.A22679
and other messages with the subject "memory mapped packe
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:29:33AM +0200, Fulvio Risso wrote:
> If you take a look at this paper:
>
> F. Risso, L. Degioanni
> An architecture for high performance network analysis
>
> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/7446/20240/00935450.pdf?tp=&arnumber=935450&;
> isnumber=20240&arSt=686&ared
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 01:08:49AM +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
> In some email I received from Fulvio Risso, sie wrote:
> > Darren, could you please give us some numbers?
> > If you take a look at this paper:
> >
> > F. Risso, L. Degioanni
> > An architecture for high performance network analysi
In some email I received from Fulvio Risso, sie wrote:
> Darren, could you please give us some numbers?
> If you take a look at this paper:
>
> F. Risso, L. Degioanni
> An architecture for high performance network analysis
>
> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/7446/20240/00935450.pdf?tp=&arnumb
