[systemd-devel] [ systemd-devel ] [PATCH] Fix Bug 72611 (systemctl is-enabled scales poorly with many units

2014-04-15 Thread david
From: Rami Rosen This patch fixes Bug 72611 (systemctl is-enabled scales poorly with many units) by using a hashmap for enabled/disabled services instead. The hashmap is a member of the manager and is initialized by a new method, build_enabled_cache(), which is called from the manager_startup()

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] core: Filter by state behind the D-Bus API, not in the systemctl client.

2014-04-28 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- src/core/dbus-manager.c| 24 +++- src/core/org.freedesktop.systemd1.conf | 4 src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 24 +--- 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/core/dbus

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add sabridge for socket activation of traditional daemons.

2013-10-14 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- .gitignore | 1 + Makefile-man.am | 1 + Makefile.am | 20 +++- 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 5e63b2a..d2d5da5 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ /systemd

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add sabridge for socket activation of traditional daemons

2013-10-14 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- .gitignore | 1 + Makefile-man.am | 1 + Makefile.am | 20 +- man/systemd-sabridge.xml | 264 src/sabridge/Makefile| 28 +++ src/sabridge/sabridge.c | 519

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add sabridge for socket activation of traditional daemons

2013-10-15 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- .gitignore | 1 + Makefile-man.am | 1 + Makefile.am | 20 +- man/systemd-sabridge.xml | 254 ++ src/sabridge/Makefile| 28 +++ src/sabridge/sabridge.c | 534

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v4] Add sabridge for socket activation of traditional daemons

2013-10-15 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- .gitignore | 1 + Makefile-man.am | 1 + Makefile.am | 20 +- man/systemd-sabridge.xml | 254 ++ src/sabridge/Makefile| 28 +++ src/sabridge/sabridge.c | 551

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v5] Add sabridge for socket activation of traditional daemons

2013-10-15 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- .gitignore | 1 + Makefile-man.am | 1 + Makefile.am | 20 +- man/systemd-sabridge.xml | 254 + src/sabridge/Makefile| 28 +++ src/sabridge/sabridge.c | 575

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Experimental socket process pool.

2013-10-21 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- .gitignore | 1 + Makefile.am| 13 ++ src/socket-process-pool/Makefile | 1 + src/socket-process-pool/socket-process-poold.c | 247 + src/socket-proxy

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Cache aggregated cgroup mask data at the slice level.

2013-11-06 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- src/core/cgroup.c | 20 +++- src/core/cgroup.h | 2 ++ src/core/unit.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/core/cgroup.c b/src/core/cgroup.c index 6a6c504..b75ab55 100644 --- a/src/core/cgroup.c +++ b/src/core

[systemd-devel] [PATCHv2] Cache aggregated cgroup mask data at the slice level.

2013-11-08 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- src/core/cgroup.c | 7 ++- src/core/cgroup.h | 2 ++ src/core/unit.c | 2 ++ src/core/unit.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/core/cgroup.c b/src/core/cgroup.c index 6a6c504..81255ea 100644 --- a/src/core/cgroup.c +++ b

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] cgroups: Cache controller masks and optimize queues.

2013-11-18 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- .gitignore | 1 + Makefile.am | 13 +++ src/core/cgroup.c | 94 +++-- src/core/cgroup.h | 2 + src/core/unit.c | 8 +++- src/core/unit.h | 1

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] install: Assume *.wants symlinks have the same name as their target for scalability.

2013-12-11 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- src/shared/install.c | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/shared/install.c b/src/shared/install.c index 17e8a75..14c0f4b 100644 --- a/src/shared/install.c +++ b/src/shared/install.c @@ -423,6 +423,11 @@ static int find_symlinks_fd

[systemd-devel] [PATCHv2] install: Assume *.wants symlinks have the same name as their target for scalability.

2013-12-13 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- src/shared/install.c | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/shared/install.c b/src/shared/install.c index 17e8a75..512e3df 100644 --- a/src/shared/install.c +++ b/src/shared/install.c @@ -419,10 +419,15 @@ static int

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Drop Before=paths/sockets/timers.target from DefaultDependencies.

2014-01-28 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- src/core/path.c | 5 - src/core/socket.c | 4 src/core/timer.c | 4 3 files changed, 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/core/path.c b/src/core/path.c index fc7069e..95ed015 100644 --- a/src/core/path.c +++ b/src/core/path.c @@ -336,11 +336,6 @@ static int

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Add an 'n' option to cgtop (equivalent to top).

2012-07-25 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- src/cgtop/cgtop.c | 25 - 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/cgtop/cgtop.c b/src/cgtop/cgtop.c index c3824c7..70570a8 100644 --- a/src/cgtop/cgtop.c +++ b/src/cgtop/cgtop.c @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ typedef struct Group

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Add a 'b' option to cgtop, equivalent to the same option in top.

2012-07-25 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- src/cgtop/cgtop.c | 30 +++--- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/cgtop/cgtop.c b/src/cgtop/cgtop.c index 70570a8..b4454c54 100644 --- a/src/cgtop/cgtop.c +++ b/src/cgtop/cgtop.c @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ static enum

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Move path to the right to mitigate alignment issues with untruncated paths. Add --full option (like systemctl) to skip all truncation.

2012-07-25 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- src/cgtop/cgtop.c | 35 --- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/cgtop/cgtop.c b/src/cgtop/cgtop.c index b4454c54..c3d2a28 100644 --- a/src/cgtop/cgtop.c +++ b/src/cgtop/cgtop.c @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static enum

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Fix title positions for dynamic column widths.

2012-07-26 Thread david
From: David Strauss --- src/cgtop/cgtop.c | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/cgtop/cgtop.c b/src/cgtop/cgtop.c index fde31b9..33e78b0 100644 --- a/src/cgtop/cgtop.c +++ b/src/cgtop/cgtop.c @@ -450,13 +450,13 @@ static int display(Hashmap *a

[systemd-devel] Unknown key name 'StopIdleSessionSec' in section 'Login'

2024-10-23 Thread David
lation did something that is causing systemd to start a session, but not close it. How can I get these 2 processes to shutdown? Is this an issue with systemd or in the configuration of Chrome? Trying to learn to be a better system admin, David *1 - https://www.admin-magazine.com/Arch

Re: [systemd-devel] Xorg or Wayland Environment

2021-09-21 Thread David Edmundson
l-session.target David

[systemd-devel] Unit shutdown order not always respected

2022-06-30 Thread David Gubler
to change its ordering behavior during shutdown. Does this ring any bells? Thank you! Best regards, David Gubler -- David Gubler System Engineer VSHN AG | Neugasse 10 | CH-8005 Zürich +41 44 545 53 00 | https://vshn.ch

Re: [systemd-devel] Setting up a VPN daemon as a Portable Service

2022-10-07 Thread David Anderson
Yeah, so far we (tailscale) haven't found a good way to run on the Steam Deck at bootup, and also survive the A/B OS updates. Systemd system extensions _can_ be activated during bootup, if you place the extension in one of the well-known locations (/var/lib/extensions would be the one to use on

[systemd-devel] Unmountable mounts and [email protected] conflicting with shutdown.target

2023-01-05 Thread Valentin David
Hello, In Ubuntu Core, we have some mounts that cannot be unmounted until we have switched root. To simplify, this looks like that: / mounts a ro loop devices backed by /some/disk/some/path/image.img /some/disk mounts a block device (let's say /dev/some-block0p1) In this case, /some/disk cannot

Re: [systemd-devel] Unmountable mounts and [email protected] conflicting with shutdown.target

2023-01-06 Thread Valentin David
@.service units have "DefaultDependencies=no" and no conflict on shutdown. Maybe this is missing then. "cryptsetup attach" might be running. On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:34 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Do, 05.01.23 14:18, Valentin David ([email protected]) > wrot

[systemd-devel] Is journald RateLimitBurst multiplier applied when Storage=volatile or Storage=none?

2023-01-13 Thread Chamberlain, David
does this work if Storage=volatile or Storage=none? Is a multiplication factor still applied? If yes, then what "free disk space" is considered? Thanks, David Chamberlain

[systemd-devel] systemd-repart very slow creation of partitions with Encrypt=

2023-06-04 Thread Valentin David
I have been trying to create a root partition from initrd with systemd-repart. The repart.d file for this partition is as follow: [Partition] Type=root Label=root Encrypt=tpm2 Format=ext4 FactoryReset=yes I am just using systemd-repart.service in initrd, without modification (that is, it finds th

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-repart very slow creation of partitions with Encrypt=

2023-06-05 Thread Valentin David
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 9:56 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On So, 04.06.23 14:25, Valentin David ([email protected]) > wrote: > > > I have been trying to create a root partition from initrd with > > systemd-repart. The repart.d file for this partition is as follo

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-repart very slow creation of partitions with Encrypt=

2023-06-05 Thread Valentin David
I think that behavior was introduced by https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/48a09a8fff480aab9a68e95e95cc37f6b1438751 On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:41 AM Valentin David wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 9:56 AM Lennart Poettering > wrote: > >> On So, 04.06.23

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-repart very slow creation of partitions with Encrypt=

2023-06-05 Thread Valentin David
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 11:09 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 05.06.23 10:41, Valentin David ([email protected]) > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 9:56 AM Lennart Poettering < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > On So

[systemd-devel] udev database cross-version compatibility

2023-09-26 Thread Valentin David
flatpak to provide /run/udev/data to containers? (Also, snapd does it, oops) -- Valentin David [email protected]

[systemd-devel] Detecting Systemd crash

2024-02-03 Thread David Timber
Systemd crashed on me the other day. I was writing up some Systemd units and testing them out by daemon-reload every time I wanted to test them out. Not the best way to go on about, I know. My bad abusing Systemd to the point of crashing. Perhaps it was just a bit flip that caused this. sys

[systemd-devel] ConditionNeedsUpdate, read-only /usr, and sysext

2024-02-07 Thread Valentin David
xample? Thanks, -- Valentin David [email protected]

[systemd-devel] Periodic tasks on battery-powered devices

2019-02-24 Thread David Strauss
I could be missing something, but I think there's a gap in the functionality for timers for periodic tasks on battery-powered devices. Basically, I want to generate a security report (SCAP style) approximately weekly but avoid doing so on battery. Here's what I've tried or looked at: - If I use C

Re: [systemd-devel] connection failure

2019-07-02 Thread David Anderson
Hi! This is the wrong list for your question. You should ask this on the help list for your linux distro, it looks like they've configured Docker incorrectly, or there's some extra required setup that you're missing. You can also consult `journalctl -u docker.service` to find clues on why Docker wo

Re: [systemd-devel] When will my timer next run?

2019-08-30 Thread David Anderson
Did you `systemctl enable rsync-Saruman.timer` to activate the timer? Timers can be enabled and disabled just like services, you need to enable it after creating. - Dave On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 8:05 PM Kenneth Porter wrote: > I've created my service timer with the following: > > [Timer] > # wai

Re: [systemd-devel] High CPU utilization by systemd process || Debian 8

2019-12-11 Thread David Anderson
Note that Debian 8 is very old. It runs systemd v215, which came out in 2014. So, from upstream's perspective, unless it's a well-known bug, the answer is probably "who knows? Use a more recent systemd." I suggest filing a bug with Debian and asking them for help. Debian 8 is still supported for a

[systemd-devel] sd_bus_add_match callback

2020-04-07 Thread David J
userdata2);   r = sd_event_loop(event);   assert(r >= 0);     bus = sd_bus_flush_close_unref(bus);   slot = sd_bus_slot_unref(slot);   event = sd_event_unref(event); } /*End =*/ I appreciate your help and your time. Thank you, David J (

Re: [systemd-devel] sd_bus_add_match callback

2020-04-09 Thread David J
x27;", callback, userdata2); > > r = sd_event_loop(event); > assert(r >= 0); > > bus = sd_bus_flush_close_unref(bus); > slot = sd_bus_slot_unref(slot); > event = sd_event_unref(event); > } > > /*End =*/ > > I appreciate your help and your time. > > Thank you, > David J ([email protected]) ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] sd_bus_add_match callback

2020-04-10 Thread David J
AM, Giacinto Cifelli wrote: > > hi Lennart, > >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 2:14 PM Lennart Poettering >> wrote: >> >>> On Do, 09.04.20 14:12, David J ([email protected]) wrote: >>> >>> Hello Systemd developers! >>> >>>

[systemd-devel] sd-bus memory check

2020-04-12 Thread David J
n 0 blocks The question is am I doing anything wrong here? Why Valgrind thinks there "might" be memory leak? The interesting part is if I use "sd_bus_open_system", Valgrind is all happy and no warnings at all! Thank you, David J. __

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus memory check

2020-04-12 Thread David J
Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:00 AM David J wrote: Hello! This is in regards to sd-bus function "sd_bus_open_system", where Valgrind reports possible memory leak. See the following code: mem_test.c: #include #include #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {   sd_bus *bus = NULL

[systemd-devel] No signal sent to stop service

2020-08-05 Thread David Cunningham
duct/current/bin/routed PIDFile=/var/run/product/routed.pid Restart=on-abnormal RestartSec=1 LimitSTACK=infinity LimitNOFILE=65535 LimitNPROC=65535 [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target -- David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited http://voisonics.com/ USA: +1 213 221 1092 New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782

Re: [systemd-devel] No signal sent to stop service

2020-08-10 Thread David Cunningham
20 at 03:08, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Do, 06.08.20 13:59, David Cunningham ([email protected]) wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm developing a service called product_routed which is managed by > systemd. > > The service can normally be stopped with "ser

Re: [systemd-devel] Confusing hwdb matching behaviour

2016-09-12 Thread David Herrmann
you break bsearch() and lookup performance would drop. A much easier solution would be to use multiple virtual tries: Prefix your generic matches with "test-generic:*foobar*" and your specific ones with "test-specific:*foobar*" and then always lookup both. This obviously only works if the number of levels is static. As a hack, I think you can use "**", "***", ... to change the ordering to your needs. We could also say each hwdb-source gets its own virtual trie and they're searched in alphabetical order. This would break ABI, but would make it a lot more powerful. Not sure. Maybe Kay has some comments? David ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] bus1, dbus(-daemon) and systemd

2016-10-05 Thread David Herrmann
nd systemd > are supposed to fit together in the future. > > If I understood David correctly, bus1 is not meant as a drop-in > replacement for dbus-daemon, but rather provide some simpler, lower > level communication primitives. Yes! > In an earlier talk by Lennart, he mentioned

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] hostnamed: regard convertible chassis type as laptop

2017-02-27 Thread David Herrmann
s. > > BTW, since the implementation seems to think the data is unreliable, > perhaps it would be prudent to say so in hostnamectl documentation, so > the consumers of the data might be more thoughtful about what to use it > for? Turned into a github PR [1]. Can we continue the discus

Re: [systemd-devel] 3CX PhoneSystem 01 Management Console won't start

2017-03-07 Thread David Strauss
This failure is not from systemd; systemd is only the messenger: > Mar 07 11:08:09 3CX systemd[1]: 3CXPhoneSystemMC01.service start operation timed out. Terminating. Someone needs to troubleshoot why 3CXPhoneSystemMC01.service is hanging when it tries to start, and this list can't answer that. Yo

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd reboot problem

2017-03-07 Thread David Strauss
> But I don't want to wait for those services to shutdown. Then there's no reason to interact with systemd if you want to force an immediate, unclean reboot. You just want something like the reboot syscall with LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART. ___ systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] How to unset "uaccess" tag in udev rule?

2017-03-25 Thread David Herrmann
I did this by creating an empty file with the same name in >> /etc/udev/rules.d which works well, but for no reason the name was >> changed some time ago which overrides my empty file and reactivates >> the problematic rule. > That's the only way. Tags cannot be unset.

Re: [systemd-devel] How to unset "uaccess" tag in udev rule?

2017-03-27 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Manuel Reimer wrote: > On 03/25/2017 05:16 PM, David Herrmann wrote: >>>> >>>> So far I did this by creating an empty file with the same name in >>>> /etc/udev/rules.d which works well, but for no reason the name was >

[systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-20 Thread David Härdeman
at gdbus does? (assuming, of course, that gdbus can be considered the "reference" implementation). Regards, David ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-20 Thread David Herrmann
Hey On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote: > Hi, > > I'm implementing a server which creates an ObjectManager using the > sd-bus API and there seems to be some differences between how gdbus and > sd-bus implements the API. > > I implemented a simple O

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-21 Thread David Härdeman
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm implementing a server which creates an ObjectManager using the >> sd-bus API and there seems to be some differences between ho

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-21 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >>On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm implementing a server which creates an ObjectM

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-25 Thread David Härdeman
April 24, 2017 4:51 PM, "Lennart Poettering" wrote: > On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, it seems that the interfaces reported by >> sd-bus should match what gdbus does? (assuming, of course, that gd

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-25 Thread David Härdeman
April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:06 PM, David Härdeman wrote: >> I'm implementing

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-25 Thread David Härdeman
April 24, 2017 5:49 PM, "Dan Williams" wrote: > On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 16:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann ([email protected]) wrote: >> >>>>> Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, it seems that the interfaces >>

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-25 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Härdeman wrote: > April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:19:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >>>> On Thu,

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-25 Thread David Härdeman
April 25, 2017 9:54 AM, "David Herrmann" wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Härdeman wrote: > >> April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, David Härdeman wrote: >> >&g

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-25 Thread David Herrmann
Hey On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 25.04.17 09:54, David Herrmann ([email protected]) wrote: > >> >> This change makes sure all objects have the built-in interfaces >> >> reported at all times. The GetManagedObjects() ca

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-25 Thread David Härdeman
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:54:45AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:40 AM, David Härdeman wrote: >> April 21, 2017 1:22 PM, "David Herrmann" wrote: >>> This change makes sure all objects have the built-in interfaces >>> reported at al

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-25 Thread David Härdeman
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:21:19PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote: >On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:54:45AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >>No, it does not. sd-bus was inconsistent. See, there are 3 things >>involved in the Object-Manager: >> >>Signal: InterfacesAdded >>

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

2017-04-25 Thread David Härdeman
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:47:24AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: >On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 07:45 +0000, David Härdeman wrote: >> April 24, 2017 5:49 PM, "Dan Williams" wrote: >>> >>> It's not clear that the GNOME side was implemented correctly yet

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] rules: block - add dm devices to whitelist

2017-07-05 Thread David Disseldorp
Ceph relies on by-partuuid symlinks, in order to locate the journal partition from a given OSD partition. For details, see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19489. --- rules/60-persistent-storage.rules | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rul

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] rules: block - add dm devices to whitelist

2017-07-10 Thread David Disseldorp
Thanks for the feedback, Lennart... On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:38:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 05.07.17 13:01, David Disseldorp ([email protected]) wrote: > > > Ceph relies on by-partuuid symlinks, in order to locate the journal > > partition from a given OSD part

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] rules: block - add dm devices to whitelist

2017-07-10 Thread David Disseldorp
> Fixed here: > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=lvm2.git;a=commit;h=c48149cf80c6582c2369bc7f8a33d794021d9dae Looks good and works for me - thanks Peter. Cheers, David ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] D-Bus Broker Project

2017-08-23 Thread David Herrmann
This is the first public release of dbus-broker. Git Tag: v3 Archive: https://github.com/bus1/dbus-broker/archive/v3/dbus-broker-v3.tar.gz The dbus-broker project is an implementation of a message bus as defined by the D-Bus specification. Its aim is to provide high performance and relia

[systemd-devel] udev

2017-10-26 Thread David Henderson
Good afternoon all! I have been looking for the udev source code to compile the library and utilities and it appears it is bundled in the systemd software. I have run autoreconf to generate a configure script (using version 233 since I don't have meson), but could not see a way to just compile th

Re: [systemd-devel] udev

2017-10-26 Thread David Henderson
simple as: builder -n udev -a i64 Dave On 10/26/17, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas > wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, 18:26 David Henderson >> wrote: >>> >>> Good afternoon all! I have been looking for the udev source

Re: [systemd-devel] udev

2017-10-26 Thread David Henderson
On 10/26/17, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, 18:26 David Henderson > wrote: > >> Good afternoon all! I have been looking for the udev source code to >> compile the library and utilities and it appears it is bundled in the >> systemd software. I have r

Re: [systemd-devel] udev

2017-10-26 Thread David Henderson
So I am using the compile flags as suggested, however, I have noticed two errors. I tried passing '--enable-static' to 'configure' and end up with: checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries...

Re: [systemd-devel] udev

2017-10-26 Thread David Henderson
On 10/26/17, David Henderson wrote: > So I am using the compile flags as suggested, however, I have noticed > two errors. I tried passing '--enable-static' to 'configure' and end > up with: > > checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes > chec

Re: [systemd-devel] udev

2017-10-30 Thread David Henderson
Good morning all! Just following up with this! Thanks, Dave On 10/26/17, David Henderson wrote: > On 10/26/17, David Henderson wrote: >> So I am using the compile flags as suggested, however, I have noticed >> two errors. I tried passing '--enable-static' to '

Re: [systemd-devel] udev

2017-10-31 Thread David Henderson
Good afternoon all. So is there another place I can get help for this problem? Thanks, Dave On 10/30/17, David Henderson wrote: > Good morning all! Just following up with this! > > Thanks, > Dave > > > On 10/26/17, David Henderson wrote: >> On 10/26/17, David He

Re: [systemd-devel] udev

2017-11-01 Thread David Henderson
On 11/1/17, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 31.10.17 14:49, David Henderson ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Good afternoon all. So is there another place I can get help for >> this problem? > > Sorry, but this isn't really the right forum for h

Re: [systemd-devel] udev

2017-11-01 Thread David Henderson
On 11/1/17, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:04:19AM -0400, David Henderson wrote: >> Good morning Lennart, thanks for the follow-up! At this point I am >> only interested in building a particular program (udev) from the >> systemD collection, not help building a

Re: [systemd-devel] udev

2017-11-01 Thread David Henderson
On 11/1/17, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:36:16AM -0400, David Henderson wrote: >> Is there a place to just get the udev code instead of all of systemD? > > No. > >> I tried looking online, but it appears that the only solo versions are >> old. I gues

Re: [systemd-devel] udev

2017-11-01 Thread David Henderson
On 11/1/17, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:49 AM, David Henderson > wrote: >> On 11/1/17, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:36:16AM -0400, David Henderson wrote: >>>> Is there a place to just get the udev code instead of all of syst

[systemd-devel] systemd-timesync and journalctl questions

2018-08-24 Thread David Weinehall
sage 1 Log message 2 Date corrected to be 2018: Log message 3 Log message 1 Log message 2 Typically this is not how we want our log to behave. Is there any way to show the log in sequential order? Kind regards, David Weinehall ___ systemd-devel mailin

[systemd-devel] Multiple initrds in unified kernel images?

2018-10-05 Thread David Anderson
Hi, I'm exploring systemd-boot and secure booting for an Arch Linux install. To get secure boot working right, I need to build a unified kernel image that I can sign. However, I also need to pass 2 initrd images into the boot process (one for CPU microcode, and the proper OS iniramfs). But, AFAIC

Re: [systemd-devel] Multiple initrds in unified kernel images?

2018-10-05 Thread David Anderson
uld just work. Please let me know if I'm wrong, and otherwise - thanks for being my rubber ducks! - Dave On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:02 AM David Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > I'm exploring systemd-boot and secure booting for an Arch Linux install. > To get secure boot working

[systemd-devel] Environment-variable security?

2018-11-12 Thread David Parsley
dbus-daemon on server systems? Thanks, -David ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] Environment-variable security?

2018-11-12 Thread David Parsley
els operation of the dockerized version. So, anybody know what API calls an unprivileged user can make to get that information from the unit file? It'd be nice to test before and after to make sure the measure is effective. Regards, -David On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 4:23 PM aleivag wrote: >

Re: [systemd-devel] Environment-variable security?

2018-11-13 Thread David Parsley
;m going to go ahead and update the Ansible role to operate that way. Regards, -David On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:18 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 12.11.18 17:41, aleivag ([email protected]) wrote: > > > You can define those secrets on /etc/robotsecret.txt, and then on your > uni

Re: [systemd-devel] Environment-variable security?

2018-11-13 Thread David Parsley
o reason for these non-privileged users to have access to that, anyway. Thanks for giving this some thought. Regards, -David On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:17 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 13.11.18 07:49, David Parsley ([email protected]) wrote: > > > I disagree; privacy of e

Re: [systemd-devel] Environment-variable security?

2018-11-14 Thread David Parsley
The practice will continue, however; TravisCI, CircleCI, and my own GopherCI all have mechanisms for providing e.g a GITHUB_PASSWORD environment variable for automated build publishing. No shock that a DevOps engineer might make the mistake of applying the same principle with system

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] terminal: fix prototypes after removal of |bus|

2015-05-04 Thread David Herrmann
keyboard.c | 8 +++- > src/libsystemd-terminal/idev.c | 6 ++ > src/libsystemd-terminal/sysview.c | 12 > 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) Thomas already applied a similar patch. Thanks! David > diff --git a/src/libsystemd-te

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add VARIANT as a standard value for /etc/os-release

2015-05-05 Thread David Herrmann
, and I >> haven't merged patches in a while due to that. But the patch looks >> good to me, looks good to merge. >> > > > Thanks, I'm re-adding systemd-devel to the CC. (I removed it when CCing you > this morning so I didn't

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: Restore udevadm settle timeout

2015-05-06 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:33:48AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: >> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:36 PM, David Herrmann >&g

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: Restore udevadm settle timeout

2015-05-07 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: > On 20.04.2015 10:33, David Herrmann wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:36 PM, David Herrmann >>> wrote: >>>>> @@ -1

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] unit: Set KillMode=mixed for services which use sulogin

2015-05-08 Thread David Herrmann
We probably want to use KillMode=mixed *as well for other units which > spawn of child processes*, but ... ..and it should have been the default right from the beginning. I think there're even plans to switch, but.. backwards compat.. Thanks David __

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] buildsys: *_la_CPPFLAGS takes $(AM_CPPFLAGS) not $(AM_CFLAGS)

2015-05-09 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote: > --- > Makefile.am | 8 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Nice catch. Applied! Thanks David > diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am > index 1ec1e77..e4d00a8 100644 > --- a/Makefile.am &

[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd

2015-05-19 Thread David Herrmann
ystemd-221 will not include it, anymore. If there are any issues, please let me know. Thanks David ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] util: fix typo

2015-05-19 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:26 PM, wrote: > From: Jan Synacek > > --- > src/shared/util.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Applied! Thanks David > diff --git a/src/shared/util.c b/src/shared/util.c > index da6343f..fd837d9 100644 > --- a/s

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd

2015-05-20 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Martin Pitt wrote: >> Hey David, >> >> David Herrmann [2015-05-19 17:06 +0200]: >>> We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in >>>

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Remove accelerometer helper

2015-05-22 Thread David Herrmann
ease soon (with the sd-bus/event exports), we can apply this patch afterwards then (with the gudev removal, too). Thanks David ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fix typos in systemd-nspawn man page

2015-05-23 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Jonathan Boulle wrote: > --- > man/systemd-nspawn.xml | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Applied! Thanks David > diff --git a/man/systemd-nspawn.xml b/man/systemd-nspawn.xml > index 6a5db86cec3c..06285edc0bb3 100

Re: [systemd-devel] What kdbus Version for systemd 220 ?

2015-05-25 Thread David Herrmann
r, due to vacation it hasn't been updated, yet. Thanks David ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] Debian Bug#618862: systemd: ignores keyscript in crypttab - a possible solution

2015-05-26 Thread David Härdeman
a workaround... ... On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 12:16:00AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 30.01.14 10:40, David Härdeman ([email protected]) wrote: > b) the password agent implementation in systemd doesn't seem to > handle binary strings (i.e. strings with '\0'), as c

[systemd-devel] bcache broke in udev 220

2015-05-31 Thread David Mohr
could you please apply it? Thanks, ~David [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/787367--- lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules.orig 2015-05-31 13:30:08.327444638 -0600 +++ lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules2015-05-31 13:30:14.799448929 -0600 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ ACTION=="rem

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >