Re: [systemd-devel] Workaround for system upgrade bug suggestions

2020-11-03 Thread Colin Guthrie
Barry wrote on 02/11/2020 22:20: > What is the work around until the bug is fixed? I'd imagine you could just disable lingering for the users in question before running the dnf upgrade command? Not ideal but it's a workaround as you asked! Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://co

Re: [systemd-devel] Workaround for system upgrade bug suggestions

2020-11-03 Thread Barry
> On 3 Nov 2020, at 12:39, Colin Guthrie wrote: > > Barry wrote on 02/11/2020 22:20: >> What is the work around until the bug is fixed? > > I'd imagine you could just disable lingering for the users in question > before running the dnf upgrade command? Not ideal but it's a workaround > as you

Re: [systemd-devel] Workaround for system upgrade bug suggestions

2020-11-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mo, 02.11.20 22:20, Barry ([email protected]) wrote: > What is the work around until the bug is fixed? First step is to understand the bug. I still don't. At very early boot-up systemd-tmpfiles.service creates the file /run/nologin, which the PAM module pam_nologin.so checks for, and if

Re: [systemd-devel] Workaround for system upgrade bug suggestions

2020-11-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 03.11.20 13:56, Barry ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > On 3 Nov 2020, at 12:39, Colin Guthrie wrote: > > > > Barry wrote on 02/11/2020 22:20: > >> What is the work around until the bug is fixed? > > > > I'd imagine you could just disable lingering for the users in question > > befo

Re: [systemd-devel] Workaround for system upgrade bug suggestions

2020-11-03 Thread Barry Scott
> On 3 Nov 2020, at 15:00, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mo, 02.11.20 22:20, Barry ([email protected]) wrote: > >> What is the work around until the bug is fixed? > > First step is to understand the bug. I still don't. > > At very early boot-up systemd-tmpfiles.service creates the f