On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> We
> had the question of creating C libraries for wrapping D-Bus APIs in
> GNOME upstream a few years ago, and we all came to the conclusion that
> instead of writing those we should rather make the D-Bus python glue
> nicer. The result
On Tue, 22.01.13 08:43, George McCollister ([email protected]) wrote:
> Are there plans (or desire) to expand the Python module included
> with systemd beyond Journal? Is there desire to replicate or wrap
> functionality provided by the DBUS API or is this beyond the design
> scope of t
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:43 AM, George McCollister
wrote:
> Is there desire to replicate or wrap functionality provided by the DBUS API
> or is this beyond the design scope of this module?
I think it would be worthwhile to support Pythonic APIs for things
like what systemctl can do from the CLI.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> The package is stuctured so that it is possible to easily add new
> modules. Any new additions would have to be generally useful to be
> included in the main package. It's just that so far, no extensions
> have been proposed, so
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:43:07AM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
> Are there plans (or desire) to expand the Python module included
> with systemd beyond Journal? Is there desire to replicate or wrap
> functionality provided by the DBUS API or is this beyond the design
> scope of this module?
Hi
