Hi Bill,
>> Without criticizing any of the existing solutions, some of the things
>> that motivated my interest in this is that I think we need: something
>> easily configured via plain configuration files by a sysadmin,
>> something that would take a limited amount of space (including its
>> depe
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Patrik Flykt
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 17:39 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
>> I'm sure I would like avoid that :) Hopefully we'll be able to reuse
>> the dhcp client from connman, but as the work of converting that into
>> a library has not
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 17:39 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> I'm sure I would like avoid that :) Hopefully we'll be able to reuse
> the dhcp client from connman, but as the work of converting that into
> a library has not yet finished I don't know yet exactly how that will
> work out.
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 23:19 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > 1) what is lacking in other userspace solutions (NetworkManager,
> > ConnMan, wicked, initscripts, etc) that requires
> > yet-another-network-daemon?
>
> Without critic
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Tom Gundersen ([email protected]) said:
>> Without criticizing any of the existing solutions, some of the things
>> that motivated my interest in this is that I think we need: something
>> easily configured via plain configuration files by a sys
Tom Gundersen ([email protected]) said:
> Without criticizing any of the existing solutions, some of the things
> that motivated my interest in this is that I think we need: something
> easily configured via plain configuration files by a sysadmin,
> something that would take a limited amount of space
sorry for double post after bounce and the huge signature,
messed up my mail client config a bit..
Holger
> We asked our self the same questions, and alternatives exists even from
> the embedded camp [1] which often comes close to the server use case.
> Even if [1] does not have a Dbus interface,
Hi Dan,
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> Having watched the discussion over the past week or so, I'm left with a
> few questions:
>
> 1) what is lacking in other userspace solutions (NetworkManager,
> ConnMan, wicked, initscripts, etc) that requires
> yet-another-network-daemon?
>
> 2) do
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> 1) what is lacking in other userspace solutions (NetworkManager,
> ConnMan, wicked, initscripts, etc) that requires
> yet-another-network-daemon?
Without criticizing any of the existing solutions, some of the things
that motivated m
Hi,
Having watched the discussion over the past week or so, I'm left with a
few questions:
1) what is lacking in other userspace solutions (NetworkManager,
ConnMan, wicked, initscripts, etc) that requires
yet-another-network-daemon?
2) do you expect that systemd-networkd will grow to include bri
10 matches
Mail list logo
