25.06.2014 06:36, Minchan Kim wrote:
Could you test this patch? It passed my test.
Thanks!
From 4ab4931c3fa7e6527e3a849d5e4c4f727143e66c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minchan Kim
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:20:24 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] zram: revalidate disk after capacity change
Alexander repo
Hello Alexander,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 07:49:58AM +, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 07:21:12AM +, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:34:50PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> > > 24.06.2014 12:22, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Hello,
> > > >
> > > >So
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 07:21:12AM +, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:34:50PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> > 24.06.2014 12:22, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > >
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >Sorry for the late response.
> >
> > Better late than never.
> >
> > >If I parse your problem
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:34:50PM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> 24.06.2014 12:22, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >Sorry for the late response.
>
> Better late than never.
>
> >If I parse your problem correctly, you meant that changing disksize is
> >failed while someone opens /de
24.06.2014 12:22, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the late response.
Better late than never.
If I parse your problem correctly, you meant that changing disksize is
failed while someone opens /dev/zram0?
I tried test which opens "/dev/zram0" with O_RDWR and sleep forever
and then echo $
Hello,
Sorry for the late response.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:38:50AM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> [maintainers of zram CC:ed, in order to alert them of this
> incompatibility with a setup published by Gentoo and possibly picked
> up by others]
>
> [Pacho Ramos CC:ed as a person who a
[maintainers of zram CC:ed, in order to alert them of this
incompatibility with a setup published by Gentoo and possibly picked up
by others]
[Pacho Ramos CC:ed as a person who asked about zram here before and who
can remove the non-working instruction listed at
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Zr
Alexander E. Patrakov schrieb:
> 09.06.2014 19:26, Kai Krakow wrote:
>> Alexander E. Patrakov schrieb:
>>
>>> I have upgraded systemd from 212 to 213 on two my Gentoo boxes, and see
>>> the same regression here: zram swap space does not get activated. It
>>> looks like systemd tries to activate
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov
wrote:
> 09.06.2014 20:11, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 09.06.2014 19:26, Kai Krakow wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov schrieb:
> I have upgraded systemd f
09.06.2014 20:11, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov
wrote:
09.06.2014 19:26, Kai Krakow wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov schrieb:
I have upgraded systemd from 212 to 213 on two my Gentoo boxes, and see
the same regression here: zram swap space does not ge
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov
wrote:
> 09.06.2014 19:26, Kai Krakow wrote:
>>
>> Alexander E. Patrakov schrieb:
>>
>>> I have upgraded systemd from 212 to 213 on two my Gentoo boxes, and see
>>> the same regression here: zram swap space does not get activated. It
>>> looks
09.06.2014 19:26, Kai Krakow wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov schrieb:
I have upgraded systemd from 212 to 213 on two my Gentoo boxes, and see
the same regression here: zram swap space does not get activated. It
looks like systemd tries to activate swap before the RUN+=mkswap part of
the udev rule
Alexander E. Patrakov schrieb:
> I have upgraded systemd from 212 to 213 on two my Gentoo boxes, and see
> the same regression here: zram swap space does not get activated. It
> looks like systemd tries to activate swap before the RUN+=mkswap part of
> the udev rule finishes.
>
> Here are the re
Hello.
I have upgraded systemd from 212 to 213 on two my Gentoo boxes, and see
the same regression here: zram swap space does not get activated. It
looks like systemd tries to activate swap before the RUN+=mkswap part of
the udev rule finishes.
Here are the relevant lines from my configurati
14 matches
Mail list logo
