Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus vs glib object path node hierarchy

2015-06-17 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 16.06.15 22:54, Krzesimir Nowak ([email protected]) wrote: >> That reminds me of a bug (or not-a-bug) in go-dbus [1] - it also generates >> flat hierarchy. This is a problem for tools like d-feet - they fail to >> intro

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus vs glib object path node hierarchy

2015-06-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 16.06.15 22:54, Krzesimir Nowak ([email protected]) wrote: > 16 cze 2015 6:09 PM "Lennart Poettering" > napisał(a): > > > > On Tue, 16.06.15 15:51, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have noticed that glib vs sd-bus have different hierarchy

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus vs glib object path node hierarchy

2015-06-16 Thread Krzesimir Nowak
16 cze 2015 6:09 PM "Lennart Poettering" napisał(a): > > On Tue, 16.06.15 15:51, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog ([email protected]) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have noticed that glib vs sd-bus have different hierarchy in terms > > of how objects are stacked. I don't have any argument why one or the > > oth

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus vs glib object path node hierarchy

2015-06-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 16.06.15 15:51, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi, > > I have noticed that glib vs sd-bus have different hierarchy in terms > of how objects are stacked. I don't have any argument why one or the > other one would be better but I was wondering what the reason for this

[systemd-devel] sd-bus vs glib object path node hierarchy

2015-06-16 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
Hi, I have noticed that glib vs sd-bus have different hierarchy in terms of how objects are stacked. I don't have any argument why one or the other one would be better but I was wondering what the reason for this difference. "/com/a/b" registered with sd_bus_add_object_vtable Introspection: └─/co