On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Simon McVittie
> wrote:
>> On 29/04/15 15:08, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
>>> We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
>>> using sd-bus over gdbus on dbu
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:08:50PM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
>> using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon. For this reason, we have high
>> interes
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Simon McVittie
wrote:
> On 29/04/15 15:08, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
>> We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
>> using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon.
> ...
>> gdbus.c
>> - g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync()
>> - 50
On 29/04/15 16:49, Greg KH wrote:
> I'll echo Simon's statement here, making a call to
> g_dbus_proxy_call_sync() seems like an odd thing to test. Is this
> really how your application wants to work? Is it the normal call path
> that you need optimized?
To be completely clear here: I am not sayi
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:08:50PM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
> using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon. For this reason, we have high
> interest in using sd-bus. What are the plans in terms of making sd-bus
>
On 29/04/15 15:08, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
> using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon.
...
> gdbus.c
> - g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync()
> - 50 x g_dbus_proxy_call_sync()
>
> sdbus.c
> - sd_bus_open_system()
> - 50
B1;3802;0cOn Wed, 29.04.15 16:08, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog ([email protected])
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
> using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon. For this reason, we have high
> interest in using sd-bus. What are the plans in terms of m
Hi,
We [1] have noticed that there could be up to %50 performance gain on
using sd-bus over gdbus on dbus-daemon. For this reason, we have high
interest in using sd-bus. What are the plans in terms of making sd-bus
API public?
Details of the test [2]:
gdbus.c
- g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync()
