On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 07:10:45PM -0800, David Strauss wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:59 PM, David Strauss wrote:
> > I don't want this work to get buried. Where are we on the revisions
> > suggested by Zbyszek?
Hi David,
just to wrap this up, I think that the only outstanding proposed
change
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:59 PM, David Strauss wrote:
> I don't want this work to get buried. Where are we on the revisions
> suggested by Zbyszek?
Never mind. Looks like it landed in master.
--
David Strauss
| [email protected]
| +1 512 577 5827 [mobile]
_
I don't want this work to get buried. Where are we on the revisions
suggested by Zbyszek?
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 02:05:27PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
>> On 23/02/13 00:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> >On Thu, Feb
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 02:05:27PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> On 23/02/13 00:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:46:35PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> >>On 21/02/13 01:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:02:56PM +, Steve
On 23/02/13 00:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:46:35PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 21/02/13 01:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:02:56PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've pushed a few more commits.
I've pushed a few commi
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:46:35PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> On 21/02/13 01:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:02:56PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> >>I've pushed a few more commits.
> >I've pushed a few commits to
> >https://github.com/keszybz/systemd/comm
On 21/02/13 01:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:02:56PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've pushed a few more commits.
I've pushed a few commits to
https://github.com/keszybz/systemd/commits/python-systemd-reader
This is your tree but rebased onto my id128 stuff,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:02:56PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> I've pushed a few more commits.
I've pushed a few commits to
https://github.com/keszybz/systemd/commits/python-systemd-reader
This is your tree but rebased onto my id128 stuff, and modified
to use it. It also has sphinx-generated d
On 19/02/13 07:05, David Strauss wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Steven Hiscocks
wrote:
Sounds good. I suppose `log_level` should become `add_loglevel_matches` for
consistency. (or actually `add_priority_matches`?)
"Log level" is the Pythonic language; please continue using it. The
j
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Steven Hiscocks
wrote:
> Sounds good. I suppose `log_level` should become `add_loglevel_matches` for
> consistency. (or actually `add_priority_matches`?)
"Log level" is the Pythonic language; please continue using it. The
journal itself may even move to it becaus
On 18/02/13 02:17, David Strauss wrote:
Great progress!
Thanks, and thank you for your feedback.
A few more remarks:
* Class methods ought to be verbs. "this_machine" and "this_boot" are
the key ones that come to mind. Maybe "add_machine_match" and
"add_boot_match"?
Sounds good. I suppose `l
Great progress!
A few more remarks:
* Class methods ought to be verbs. "this_machine" and "this_boot" are
the key ones that come to mind. Maybe "add_machine_match" and
"add_boot_match"?
* In methods like "this_machine" that have special handling for the
None value as "myself," the function shoul
On 11/02/13 05:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:20:57PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I thought the easiest way was to just inherit the Journal (now
_Journal), replacing __new__ with all the python RunString stuff.
https://github.com/kwirk/systemd/commit/9003fdb
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:37:34AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 04.02.13 18:30, Steven Hiscocks ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> > So if I understand correctly, a _BOOT_ID match must be in place for
> > sd_journal_seek_monotonic_usec to function correctly?
>
> No really, i
On Mon, 04.02.13 18:30, Steven Hiscocks ([email protected]) wrote:
> So if I understand correctly, a _BOOT_ID match must be in place for
> sd_journal_seek_monotonic_usec to function correctly?
No really, it should suffice to just pass the valid boot id to
_seek_monotonic(). Are you sa
On Sun, 03.02.13 21:18, Steven Hiscocks ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been developing a python module for accessing the journal,
> using the journal API. (https://github.com/kwirk/pyjournalctl)
>
> One issue I've had is with 'sd_journal_seek_monotonic_usec'. When
> called
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:20:57PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> I thought the easiest way was to just inherit the Journal (now
> _Journal), replacing __new__ with all the python RunString stuff.
> https://github.com/kwirk/systemd/commit/9003fdbc69577840ab6a1501a1c49f7377b6124d
Hi Steven,
comme
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:19:03PM -0800, David Strauss wrote:
> Can we spend some time on IRC prepping the systemd patch? I'd like to
> get that rolling.
Hi David,
I pushed an updated version of [1], with uuid.UUID all over. Please
have a look.
Zbyszek
[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull
On 08/02/13 20:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:51:48PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 06/02/13 00:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:45:10PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
O
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:51:48PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> On 06/02/13 00:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:45:10PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> >>On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steve
On 06/02/13 00:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:45:10PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
H
Can we spend some time on IRC prepping the systemd patch? I'd like to
get that rolling.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Steven Hiscocks
wrote:
> On 06/02/13 00:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:45:10PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/02/13 23:00,
On 06/02/13 00:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:45:10PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
H
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:25:47AM -0800, David Strauss wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > What about renaming Journalctl to Journal? It doesn't really control
> > anything :)
>
> Neither does the actual journalctl. :-)
True.
> But, systemd's namin
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:45:10PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> >>On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02
On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've made the suggested changes and pushed it to gi
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> >>I've made the suggested changes and pushed it to github. Feedback
> >>welcomed :)
> >Thanks!
>
On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've made the suggested changes and pushed it to github. Feedback
welcomed :)
Thanks!
Some more thoughts on the API below. Some of those are probably
stupid, but I want t
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> What about renaming Journalctl to Journal? It doesn't really control anything
> :)
Neither does the actual journalctl. :-)
But, systemd's naming convention is to call first-tier shell utilities
ctl and second-tier shell utilit
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> I've made the suggested changes and pushed it to github. Feedback
> welcomed :)
Thanks!
Some more thoughts on the API below. Some of those are probably
stupid, but I want to throw them out in the open, for your feedback.
SD_M
On 04/02/13 18:30, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 04/02/13 05:13, David Strauss wrote:
I second the interest in committing this to the existing Python
support once polished.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +, Steven Hiscocks
On 04/02/13 05:13, David Strauss wrote:
I second the interest in committing this to the existing Python
support once polished.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
Hi,
I've been developing a python
I second the interest in committing this to the existing Python
support once polished.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been developing a python module for accessing the journal,
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been developing a python module for accessing the journal,
> using the journal API. (https://github.com/kwirk/pyjournalctl)
Great! Have you thought about including it in the systemd repo,
once interface nad implementat
Hi,
I've been developing a python module for accessing the journal, using
the journal API. (https://github.com/kwirk/pyjournalctl)
One issue I've had is with 'sd_journal_seek_monotonic_usec'. When
called, followed by call to 'sd_journal_next', I end up at the start of
the journal.
If I set a
35 matches
Mail list logo
