On Thu, 17.02.11 13:46, Miklos Vajna ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > Hmm, I am kinda keen on keeping the fsck output also in syslog, hence
> > just switching the output from syslog to tty is not ideal. Maybe we
> > shoul
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 01:11:36AM +0100, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Hmm, I am kinda keen on keeping the fsck output also in syslog, hence
> just switching the output from syslog to tty is not ideal. Maybe we
> should add a mechanism so that we can output things to syslog and
> console at the sa
On Mon, 20.12.10 16:51, Miklos Vajna ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We got some report[1] recently that not everyone is happy with the
> current lack of fsck output during the boot process.
>
> As far as I understand there are two conflicting requirement:
>
> 1. Execute fsck processe
Hi,
We got some report[1] recently that not everyone is happy with the
current lack of fsck output during the boot process.
As far as I understand there are two conflicting requirement:
1. Execute fsck processes in parallel, as in case the disks are in
different buses then this causes massive
