On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 07:50:43AM -0600, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> I noticed that when isolating a target that requires a .socket, the
> .service which the socket activates will be stopped. Is this
> intentional?
> I expected the service to be left alone (even in the weaker case that the
> socket
I noticed that when isolating a target that requires a .socket, the
.service which the socket activates will be stopped. Is this intentional?
I expected the service to be left alone (even in the weaker case that the socket
wasn't already active).
___
syst
