Re: [systemd-devel] encrypted swap

2013-03-04 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 04.03.2013 19:05, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > This looks like your LVM/DM implementation is borked (compiled without > udev support?). lvm2-2.02.98 with udev-197 compiled in ... recompiled right now, still waiting for timeout at boot. > Please reporting this to the LVM/DM folks, this is som

Re: [systemd-devel] encrypted swap

2013-03-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 02.03.13 11:06, Stefan G. Weichinger ([email protected]) wrote: > > Am 01.03.2013 19:39, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > > Can you provide the log where this happens? Boot with > > systemd.log_level=debug and provide us with the journalctl output around > > where this problem happens. > >

Re: [systemd-devel] encrypted swap

2013-03-02 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 01.03.2013 19:39, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > Can you provide the log where this happens? Boot with > systemd.log_level=debug and provide us with the journalctl output around > where this problem happens. I put up the output of "journalctl -b" here: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/24516209/systemd

Re: [systemd-devel] encrypted swap

2013-03-01 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 18.02.13 22:59, Stefan G. Weichinger ([email protected]) wrote: > > Am 14.02.2013 00:23, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > > > > I see an issue with systemd-197 on one of my gentoo systems. > > > > Encrypted swap doesn't get enabled correctly as mentioned below. > > > > In the git-repo of s

Re: [systemd-devel] encrypted swap

2013-02-18 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 14.02.2013 00:23, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > > I see an issue with systemd-197 on one of my gentoo systems. > > Encrypted swap doesn't get enabled correctly as mentioned below. > > In the git-repo of systemd I read in the TODO-file: > >> swap units that are activated by one name but sho

[systemd-devel] encrypted swap

2013-02-13 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
I see an issue with systemd-197 on one of my gentoo systems. Encrypted swap doesn't get enabled correctly as mentioned below. In the git-repo of systemd I read in the TODO-file: > swap units that are activated by one name but shown in the kernel > under another are semi-broken Might that be re