Am Dienstag, den 19.06.2012, 12:10 +0200 schrieb Kay Sievers:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 19.06.2012, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> >> On Tue, 19.06.12 11:42, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> >> > > > I guess it is useful to have an abstraction lay
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 19/06/12 19:58 did gyre and gimble:
> On Tue, 19.06.12 19:06, Colin Guthrie ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>>> Or do whatever they used to do in the past and bet it works, like it
>>> did most of the time. The problem is pretty much solved from systemd's
>
On Tue, 19.06.12 19:06, Colin Guthrie ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Or do whatever they used to do in the past and bet it works, like it
> > did most of the time. The problem is pretty much solved from systemd's
> > point of view, so there will be no effort from this side.
> >
> > The only sa
'Twas brillig, and Kay Sievers at 19/06/12 11:10 did gyre and gimble:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Paul Menzel
> wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, den 19.06.2012, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>>> On Tue, 19.06.12 11:42, Paul Menzel ([email protected])
>>> wrote:
>
>> I
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Paul Menzel
wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 19.06.2012, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>> On Tue, 19.06.12 11:42, Paul Menzel ([email protected])
>> wrote:
>> > > > I guess it is useful to have an abstraction layer because directories
>> > > >
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:42:10AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Nah, really, cpufrequtils should just go away. People should use the
> > kernel APIs right away.
>
> alright looking into why `cpufrequtils` is installed on my system I now
> know the reasons. The frequency(?) modules are not loaded
Am Dienstag, den 19.06.2012, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Tue, 19.06.12 11:42, Paul Menzel ([email protected]) wrote:
Dear Lennart,
> > > > I guess it is useful to have an abstraction layer because directories
> > > > and files under `/sys` might change.
> > >
>
On Tue, 19.06.12 11:42, Paul Menzel ([email protected]) wrote:
Heya,
> > > I guess it is useful to have an abstraction layer because directories
> > > and files under `/sys` might change.
> >
> > Nah, really, cpufrequtils should just go away. People should use the
> > kernel APIs
Am Dienstag, den 19.06.2012, 10:03 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Mon, 18.06.12 21:56, Paul Menzel ([email protected]) wrote:
Dear Lennart,
[…]
> > > What is cpufrequitls for? Why would anybody fiddle with that? "ondemand"
> > > is the only CPU scheduler that makes sense
