Am 27.09.2011 20:01, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> There's some borked software around which when it finds getppid() == 1
> follows a different code path on init then otherwise, in the ill-fated
> attempt to detect whether a daemon is started from the old inittab
> instead of on an init script. Yo
On Tue, 27.09.11 18:21, Stefan G. Weichinger ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> Am 27.09.2011 16:19, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>
> > Also see this blog story I posted yesterday with a longer
> > explanation:
> >
> > http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/inetd.html
> >
> > (Sorry if that loads very slow
Am 27.09.2011 16:19, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> Also see this blog story I posted yesterday with a longer
> explanation:
>
> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/inetd.html
>
> (Sorry if that loads very slowly only. The server is currently under
> pressure due to the PA 1.0 release)
Thanks for
On Tue, 27.09.11 10:01, Stefan G. Weichinger ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> Am 26.09.2011 18:43, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>
> > If this is an inetd service you need to specify "StandardInput=socket"
> > here. That directive makes sure the sockets are passes on fds 0-2 to the
> > spawned process
Am 26.09.2011 18:43, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> If this is an inetd service you need to specify "StandardInput=socket"
> here. That directive makes sure the sockets are passes on fds 0-2 to the
> spawned process which is how inetd does it too.
I am sure I had that option set at some point when
On Wed, 14.09.11 22:31, Stefan G. Weichinger ([email protected]) wrote:
Sorry for the delay, but I hope this is useful still:
>
> What I have now:
>
> # cat amanda.socket
> [Socket]
> ListenStream=10080
> Accept=true
>
> [Install]
> WantedBy=sockets.target
>
> # cat amanda\@.service
> [Unit]
> De
Am 15.09.2011 12:06, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> Got it/something working.
>
> amcheck succeeds now, will test an actual backup now.
Removed StandardOutput again.
Doing backups with amdump fails, the socket fails on the target machine.
I do some other work now.
Feedback welcome.
Stefan
Got it/something working.
amcheck succeeds now, will test an actual backup now.
Pls review my current files and tell me if I do something wrong maybe.
Went back to Accept=True now and added StandardOutput:
# cat amanda.socket
[Socket]
ListenStream=10080
Accept=True
[Install]
WantedBy=sock
Am 15.09.2011 10:47, schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:15:05AM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Am 15.09.2011 08:49, schrieb Michael Olbrich:
>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:49:30PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>> Are the sshd.socket/[email protected] from
>>> http://0poi
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:15:05AM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 15.09.2011 08:49, schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:49:30PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > Are the sshd.socket/[email protected] from
> > http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-units/ working? If not, th
Am 15.09.2011 08:49, schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:49:30PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> nope, systemd-29-r2 here (latest in gentoo-portage)
>
> That's rather old.
There are issues with udev herer, so the devs still hold back new releases:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:49:30PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 14.09.2011 23:36, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
> > One more thing to check: if you use a very recent version of systemd
> > (afair v35 and up) try adding StandardInput=socket and
> > StandardOutput=socket to the service file.
Am 15.09.2011 00:35, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
> Do you actually see any amanda service instances started in the
> systemctl output?
nope.
maybe the naming is wrong?
I have
/etc/systemd/system/amanda.socket
and
/etc/systemd/system/[email protected]
S
2011/9/15 Stefan G. Weichinger :
>
> additional info:
>
> # systemctl status amanda.socket
> amanda.socket
> Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/amanda.socket)
> Active: failed since Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:04:17 +0200; 19min ago
> Accepted: 22; Connected: 0
> CGroup:
additional info:
# systemctl status amanda.socket
amanda.socket
Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/amanda.socket)
Active: failed since Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:04:17 +0200; 19min ago
Accepted: 22; Connected: 0
CGroup: name=systemd:/system/amanda.socket
What doe
Am 14.09.2011 23:36, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
>> Maybe the "Type" of the service is wrong?
> Easy to check: if you execute the command in a shell does amandad
> background itself? If yes type should be forking, else Type=simple
> (the default) is fine.
Don't know.
# su amanda
$ /usr/libexec/am
2011/9/14 Stefan G. Weichinger :
> Am 14.09.2011 22:58, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
>
>> Pretty much identical to what I wrote. You can find information about
>> User and Group in systemd.exec.
>
> Ah, yes, did now.
>
>> Minor detail: you don't want the Install section in the service file.
>> systemd w
Am 14.09.2011 22:58, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
> Pretty much identical to what I wrote. You can find information about
> User and Group in systemd.exec.
Ah, yes, did now.
> Minor detail: you don't want the Install section in the service file.
> systemd wouldn't know what to fill in behind the @.
2011/9/14 Stefan G. Weichinger :
> What I have now:
>
> # cat amanda.socket
> [Socket]
> ListenStream=10080
> Accept=true
>
> [Install]
> WantedBy=sockets.target
>
> # cat amanda\@.service
> [Unit]
> Description=amandad
>
> [Service]
> ExecStart=-/usr/libexec/amanda/amandad -auth=bsdtcp amdump
> Us
Here it is
2011/9/10 Mirco Tischler :
> 2011/9/8 Stefan G. Weichinger :
>>
>> Greets, systemd-devs and -users,
>>
>> maybe I ask a FAQ, pls be kind ...
>>
>> I am rather new to systemd and figuring out how to use it w/ gentoo
>> linux. It is available within the gentoo-portage-package-system, yes.
What I have now:
# cat amanda.socket
[Socket]
ListenStream=10080
Accept=true
[Install]
WantedBy=sockets.target
# cat amanda\@.service
[Unit]
Description=amandad
[Service]
ExecStart=-/usr/libexec/amanda/amandad -auth=bsdtcp amdump
User=amanda
Group=amanda
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
T
Am 2011-09-14 21:43, schrieb Jan Willies:
> 2011/9/14 Stefan G. Weichinger mailto:[email protected]>>
>
> Am 2011-09-14 21 :28, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
> > Hm. Didn't you get my reply or was it not extensive enough?
>
> Didn't get it. Might be related to the problem with policyd-weight i
Am 2011-09-14 21:28, schrieb Mirco Tischler:
> Hm. Didn't you get my reply or was it not extensive enough?
Didn't get it. Might be related to the problem with policyd-weight in
the last days (false positives due to a dead RBL).
Please resend, thanks in advance.
Stefan
__
2011/9/14 Stefan G. Weichinger :
> Am 2011-09-08 22:39, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>
>> Greets, systemd-devs and -users,
>>
>> maybe I ask a FAQ, pls be kind ...
>>
>> I am rather new to systemd and figuring out how to use it w/ gentoo
>> linux. It is available within the gentoo-portage-package
Am 2011-09-08 22:39, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> Greets, systemd-devs and -users,
>
> maybe I ask a FAQ, pls be kind ...
>
> I am rather new to systemd and figuring out how to use it w/ gentoo
> linux. It is available within the gentoo-portage-package-system,
> yes. Compiles etc.
>
> But
2011/9/8 Stefan G. Weichinger :
>
> Greets, systemd-devs and -users,
>
> maybe I ask a FAQ, pls be kind ...
>
> I am rather new to systemd and figuring out how to use it w/ gentoo
> linux. It is available within the gentoo-portage-package-system, yes.
> Compiles etc.
>
> But IMO it still needs some
Greets, systemd-devs and -users,
maybe I ask a FAQ, pls be kind ...
I am rather new to systemd and figuring out how to use it w/ gentoo
linux. It is available within the gentoo-portage-package-system, yes.
Compiles etc.
But IMO it still needs some polishing there.
Aside from the distro-specifi
27 matches
Mail list logo
