Re: [systemd-devel] containers again

2015-09-08 Thread Richard Maw
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 04:14:58PM +0200, Michał Zegan wrote: > Hello. > > Before you stated that containers are not a security feature right > now. It is required to manually shift uids/gids on images etc. Yes. Also, if you uid-shift the container's root directory, using `--private-users` witho

[systemd-devel] containers again

2015-09-08 Thread Michał Zegan
Hello. Before you stated that containers are not a security feature right now. It is required to manually shift uids/gids on images etc. What are other known problems with containers that use ALL namespaces? Like if not counting the problem of uid allocation and manual shifting of them. _

Re: [systemd-devel] containers

2015-09-06 Thread arnaud gaboury
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sun, 06.09.15 17:49, Michał Zegan ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> Is systemd-nspawn intended to eventually become usable for full system >> containers/general use with enough security to run things like vps hostin

Re: [systemd-devel] containers

2015-09-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 06.09.15 17:49, Michał Zegan ([email protected]) wrote: > Hello. > > Is systemd-nspawn intended to eventually become usable for full system > containers/general use with enough security to run things like vps hosting? > How much is missing to be able to do that, or maybe it alrea

[systemd-devel] containers

2015-09-06 Thread Michał Zegan
Hello. Is systemd-nspawn intended to eventually become usable for full system containers/general use with enough security to run things like vps hosting? How much is missing to be able to do that, or maybe it already can? Like you have user namespaces support that probably adds more security