Re: [systemd-devel] CentOS CI test suites failing

2019-05-28 Thread František Šumšal
The out-of-space issue seems to be resolved, for now, and the systemd CentOS CI script should respect the (apparently) newly introduced rate-limiting machinery. I went through the PRs updated in the last few hours and re-triggered all CentOS CI jobs, so it now eating through the backlog. Given th

Re: [systemd-devel] CentOS CI test suites failing

2019-05-28 Thread František Šumšal
This might take a little bit longer than anticipated, as the Jenkins slave also ran out of space. On 5/28/19 10:02 PM, František Šumšal wrote: > Hello! > > Thanks for the heads up. This was unfortunately caused by two simultaneous > issues: > > 1) CentOS CI pool ran out of pre-installed machin

Re: [systemd-devel] CentOS CI test suites failing

2019-05-28 Thread František Šumšal
Hello! Thanks for the heads up. This was unfortunately caused by two simultaneous issues: 1) CentOS CI pool ran out of pre-installed machines 2) I forgot to handle such situation in the systemd CentOS CI code :-) After giving the CentOS CI a few hours to get back on its tracks, I'll shortly mer

[systemd-devel] CentOS CI test suites failing

2019-05-28 Thread zach
Looks like CentOS CI test suites are failing on multiple PRs with errors like those listed below. Any advise on how to get these passing again or who I could reach out to for help getting this back in order? 2019-05-28 16:04:26,307 [agent-control/] ERROR: Execution failed Traceback (most recent ca

Re: [systemd-devel] centos-ci

2016-04-15 Thread Daniel Mack
On 04/12/2016 01:52 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > Anyone know that centos is not running the latest version(s) of systemd > required for the upstream bug tracker so one has to ask what > notification spam is this > "Can one of the admins verify this patch?" Regarding that spam, I already to

Re: [systemd-devel] centos-ci

2016-04-14 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > The rhel-ci people offered us to use their spare machines, that's > all. And Daniel took them up on it, and is now working on getting this > hooked up. It is not even rhel-ci (as in Red Hat internal), rather CentOS CI, which is communi

Re: [systemd-devel] centos-ci

2016-04-12 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 12.04.16 14:57, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: > >Right now the CI systems we use are all based on Ubuntu, which is > >kinda weird, as most of the systemd core developers actually work for > >RH and run Fedora locally... ;-) > > I see but It's should not matter which co

Re: [systemd-devel] centos-ci

2016-04-12 Thread Jóhann B . Guðmundsson
On 04/12/2016 02:43 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 12.04.16 11:52, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: Anyone know that centos is not running the latest version(s) of systemd required for the upstream bug tracker so one has to ask what notification spam is this "Can one o

Re: [systemd-devel] centos-ci

2016-04-12 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 12.04.16 11:52, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: > Anyone know that centos is not running the latest version(s) of systemd > required for the upstream bug tracker so one has to ask what notification > spam is this > "Can one of the admins verify this patch?" Daniel is wor

[systemd-devel] centos-ci

2016-04-12 Thread Jóhann B . Guðmundsson
Anyone know that centos is not running the latest version(s) of systemd required for the upstream bug tracker so one has to ask what notification spam is this "Can one of the admins verify this patch?" JBG ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@