On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 00:26 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 23.11.16 12:59, Bastien Nocera ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> > The latter is currently [not parsed](http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&;
> > m=147981183211362&w=2) as of kernel 4.9-rc5.
> > If there is no mount-matrix defined in th
On Wed, 23.11.16 12:59, Bastien Nocera ([email protected]) wrote:
> The latter is currently [not
> parsed](http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=147981183211362&w=2) as of kernel
> 4.9-rc5.
> If there is no mount-matrix defined in the device-tree or ACPI DSDT, or
> the data is incorrect, it can be ove
On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 12:59 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> If you want to give a try to sending a patch with a new "70-
> accelerometer.hwdb" file, something along the lines of:
Make that "70-sensors.hwdb" as I think we might add a few more things
related to sensors in the future.
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 23:43 +0100, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 17:23 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22.11.16 12:13, Bastien Nocera ([email protected]) wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey,
> > > >
> > >
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 17:23 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 22.11.16 12:13, Bastien Nocera ([email protected]) wrote:
> >
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > I'm adding support for reading the mount-matrix[1] from
> > > accelerometer
> > >
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 17:23 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 22.11.16 12:13, Bastien Nocera ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > I'm adding support for reading the mount-matrix[1] from
> > accelerometer
> > devices in iio-sensor-proxy, but we'll need to add a way to
> > overrid
On Tue, 22.11.16 12:13, Bastien Nocera ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm adding support for reading the mount-matrix[1] from accelerometer
> devices in iio-sensor-proxy, but we'll need to add a way to override
> the mount-matrix in case the data from the device-tree is incorrect, or
> mis
Hey,
I'm adding support for reading the mount-matrix[1] from accelerometer
devices in iio-sensor-proxy, but we'll need to add a way to override
the mount-matrix in case the data from the device-tree is incorrect, or
missing[2].
I was wondering whether we should ship the hwdb quirks in systemd or
