15.09.2019 6:12, Daniel Duong пишет:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 2 template units: 1 for a service and 1 for a socket. Each
> instance is a version of my web application.
>
> After a successful deploy, I stop and disable the old version and I
> enable the new one:
> systemctl start belleshop@0.2.soc
> You should check to see if anything is actually still referencing these
> units. Try `systemd-analyze dump` and see if any "ReferencedBy" entries
> appear for these units.
It seems that they are referencing each other:
-> Unit belleshop@0.58.service:
[...]
> Normally units should be unloaded immediately if they are stopped
> and didn't fail. What systemd version are you using? (One possibility
> to consider is that the glob matches *files*, and you are simply loading
> the units at the time the systemctl query is made. Use 'belleshop@*'
> instead.)
I
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, Daniel Duong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 2 template units: 1 for a service and 1 for a socket. Each
> instance is a version of my web application.
>
> After a successful deploy, I stop and disable the old version and I
> enable the new one:
> systemctl start belleshop@0.2
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 16.09.19 um 09:36 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> > Normally units should be unloaded immediately if they are stopped
> > and didn't fail. What systemd version are you using?
>
> the better question is which one are you using because this behav
Am 16.09.19 um 09:36 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> Normally units should be unloaded immediately if they are stopped
> and didn't fail. What systemd version are you using?
the better question is which one are you using because this behavior
below exists for many years and it's good give
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 03:12:22AM +, Daniel Duong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 2 template units: 1 for a service and 1 for a socket. Each
> instance is a version of my web application.
>
> After a successful deploy, I stop and disable the old version and I
> enable the new one:
> systemct
Am 15.09.19 um 15:55 schrieb Daniel Duong:
>> what about "systemctl daemon-reload”?
>> it's not mentioned anywhere in your post
> I tried, it doesn’t remove the old units.
if it's physically there it still keep loaded
if it's physically gone it don't
___
> what about "systemctl daemon-reload”?
> it's not mentioned anywhere in your post
I tried, it doesn’t remove the old units.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Am 15.09.19 um 05:12 schrieb Daniel Duong:
> I have a 2 template units: 1 for a service and 1 for a socket. Each
> instance is a version of my web application.
>
> After a successful deploy, I stop and disable the old version and I
> enable the new one:
> systemctl start belleshop@0.2.sock
Hi,
I have a 2 template units: 1 for a service and 1 for a socket. Each
instance is a version of my web application.
After a successful deploy, I stop and disable the old version and I
enable the new one:
systemctl start belleshop@0.2.socket
# Test that everything is fine
11 matches
Mail list logo
