Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --user and the role of DBUS API

2015-08-19 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Simon McVittie < [email protected]> wrote: > On 19/08/15 14:12, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > > > The user bus address is > > ... tried by default in libdbus 1.9, GLib 2.45, and sd-bus; so you don't > need to set DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS at all, unless you

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --user and the role of DBUS API

2015-08-19 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Michał Zegan wrote: > I may not understand something, but how does it work when I have things > like at-spi2-registryd running on my session? I cannot start one local and > one remote gui session, for example? Of course I mean the user bus. > I don't know how at-

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --user and the role of DBUS API

2015-08-19 Thread Michał Zegan
I may not understand something, but how does it work when I have things like at-spi2-registryd running on my session? I cannot start one local and one remote gui session, for example? Of course I mean the user bus. W dniu 19.08.2015 o 18:13, Simon McVittie pisze: On 19/08/15 14:12, Mantas Miku

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --user and the role of DBUS API

2015-08-19 Thread Simon McVittie
On 19/08/15 14:12, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > sd-bus has better performance and native > kdbus support (and a better API than e.g. dbus-glib), but if you're > writing programs in GTK or Qt or EFL, then you'll still want GDBus or > QtDBus or Eldbus. To clarify, *everything* has a better API than dbu

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --user and the role of DBUS API

2015-08-19 Thread Ian Geiser
On 08/19/2015 11:32 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ian Geiser mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: ...snip... Not quite; …/systemd/private is not even a bus – it's a direct peer-to-peer connection to systemd, providing just that one service. (It is therefore in

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --user and the role of DBUS API

2015-08-19 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ian Geiser wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Ian Geiser wrote: > > Greetings, I am struggling with search queries here so I need to ask > this outright. "what is the role of dbus going forward?" Is dbus the > preferred way going forward? Or should thin

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --user and the role of DBUS API

2015-08-19 Thread Ian Geiser
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Ian Geiser mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Greetings, I am struggling with search queries here so I need to ask this > outright. "what is the role of dbus going forward?" Is dbus the preferred > way going forward? Or should things really be using sd-bus.

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --user and the role of DBUS API

2015-08-19 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Ian Geiser wrote: > Greetings, I am struggling with search queries here so I need to ask this outright. "what is the role of dbus going forward?" Is dbus the preferred way going forward? Or should things really be using sd-bus.h instead? D-Bus is not going away

[systemd-devel] Systemd --user and the role of DBUS API

2015-08-19 Thread Ian Geiser
Greetings, I am struggling with search queries here so I need to ask this outright. "what is the role of dbus going forward?" Is dbus the preferred way going forward? Or should things really be using sd-bus.h instead? I manage an embedded product that leverages system heavily at the system le