On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 at 09:58:54 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> dbus-daemon for example uses:
>
> ExecReload=/usr/bin/busctl call org.freedesktop.DBus
> /org/freedesktop/DBus org.freedesktop.DBus ReloadConfig
>
> Which is a synchronous call to reload the config: the daemon is told
> to re
On Sa, 09.04.22 19:20, Leon Fauster ([email protected]) wrote:
> It seems that killing with USR1|USR2|HUP is commonly used:
>
> $ grep -R ExecReload /usr/lib/systemd/|grep -v kill|wc -l
> 19
> $ grep -R ExecReload /usr/lib/systemd/|grep kill|wc -l
> 27
Yes. I am aware. It's less than ide
On Sa, 09.04.22 08:00, Yolo von BNANA ([email protected]) wrote:
> --- Original Message ---
> On Friday, April 8th, 2022 at 13:49, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
> > This could be done better. Plugging in just a "kill" here, means the
> > reload is async. i.e. "systemctl reload" will basicall
Am 09.04.22 um 10:00 schrieb Yolo von BNANA:
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, April 8th, 2022 at 13:49, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
This could be done better. Plugging in just a "kill" here, means the
reload is async. i.e. "systemctl reload" will basically return
immediately without
On 09/04/2022 09:00, Yolo von BNANA wrote:
Can you please explain this in more Detail?
What does this mean: " "systemctl reload" will basically return
immediately without the reload being complete"?
And what is an Example for an synchronous command for ExecReload=
Do you understand the differe
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, April 8th, 2022 at 13:49, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> This could be done better. Plugging in just a "kill" here, means the
> reload is async. i.e. "systemctl reload" will basically return
> immediately without the reload being complete, thus subsequent
On Do, 07.04.22 15:38, Kenneth Porter ([email protected]) wrote:
> --On Thursday, April 07, 2022 12:30 PM +0200 Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
> > The other two options are likely similar, i.e. synchronous and talk to
> > smbd directly. But I don't know samba that well, so it's just an
> > ass
--On Thursday, April 07, 2022 12:30 PM +0200 Lennart Poettering
wrote:
The other two options are likely similar, i.e. synchronous and talk to
smbd directly. But I don't know samba that well, so it's just an
assumption. In fact, if ExecStop= in smbd.service just calls the
smbcontrol they behave
On Mi, 06.04.22 06:21, Yolo von BNANA ([email protected]) wrote:
> What is the best way to reload the Samba Configuration – and why?
>
> 1. systemctl reload smbd
> 2. smbcontrol smbd reload-config
> 3. pkill -HUP smbd
>
> I think it's this Order. (1 is best)
> But I couldn't explain it to somebody els
Ok thanks
*From:* Mantas Mikulėnas [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* 24 May 2017 08:25
*To:* John Winward
*Cc:* Systemd
*Subject:* Re: [systemd-devel] Samba
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:21 AM, John Winward
wrote:
Morning
I have just installed a CentOS 7 system and I hace install many
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:21 AM, John Winward
wrote:
> Morning
>
>
>
> I have just installed a CentOS 7 system and I hace install many CentOS
> platgforms over the years
>
>
>
> However, I cannot seem to get SAMBA running and have nenver had issues
> with this before?
>
>
>
> [root@d3server ~]£
Morning
I have just installed a CentOS 7 system and I hace install many CentOS
platgforms over the years
However, I cannot seem to get SAMBA running and have nenver had issues with
this before?
[root@d3server ~]£ systemctl start
smb
Job for smb.service failed because the control process e
Am 06.07.2016 um 07:12 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Sun, 26.06.16 14:28, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
Am 26.06.2016 um 14:16 schrieb Tom H:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.06.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Ralf Recktenwald:
Smb.conf
how is that a s
On Sun, 26.06.16 14:28, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.06.2016 um 14:16 schrieb Tom H:
> >On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Reindl Harald
> >wrote:
> >>Am 26.06.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Ralf Recktenwald:
> >>>
> >>>Smb.conf
> >>
> >>how is that a systemd problem?
> >>
>
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Ralf Recktenwald
wrote:
> Smb.conf:
>
>
>
> [global]
>
> workgroup = smb
>
> security = share
>
> share modes = yes
>
>
>
> [homes]
>
> comment = Home Directories
>
> browsable = no
>
> read only = no
>
> create mode = 0750
>
>
>
> [public]
>
> path = /media/stora
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 26.06.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Ralf Recktenwald:
>>
>> Smb.conf
>
> how is that a systemd problem?
>
> how do you imagine help without mention distrubition, software-versions,
> cotent of the systemd-unit, systemctl status servicename and so
Am 26.06.2016 um 14:16 schrieb Tom H:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.06.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Ralf Recktenwald:
Smb.conf
how is that a systemd problem?
how do you imagine help without mention distrubition, software-versions,
cotent of the systemd-unit, system
Am 26.06.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Ralf Recktenwald:
Smb.conf
how is that a systemd problem?
how do you imagine help without mention distrubition, software-versions,
cotent of the systemd-unit, systemctl status servicename and so on?
it's really tiresome:
http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-q
Smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = smb
security = share
share modes = yes
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browsable = no
read only = no
create mode = 0750
[public]
path = /media/storage/
public = yes
writable = yes
comment = smb share
printable = no
guest ok = yes
19 matches
Mail list logo
