Re: [systemd-devel] PrivateTmp and systemd-tmpfiles

2012-10-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 18.10.12 14:42, Lukáš Nykrýn ([email protected]) wrote: > > Kay Sievers píše v St 17. 10. 2012 v 18:28 +0200: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Lennart Poettering > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 17.10.12 14:16, Lukáš Nykrýn ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > > >> Hello, > > >> Today I have

Re: [systemd-devel] PrivateTmp and systemd-tmpfiles

2012-10-18 Thread Lukáš Nykrýn
Kay Sievers píše v St 17. 10. 2012 v 18:28 +0200: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Wed, 17.10.12 14:16, Lukáš Nykrýn ([email protected]) wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> Today I have read this bug > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866693 and describe

Re: [systemd-devel] PrivateTmp and systemd-tmpfiles

2012-10-17 Thread Peeters Simon
2012/10/17 Lennart Poettering : > On Wed, 17.10.12 14:16, Lukáš Nykrýn ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Hello, >> Today I have read this bug >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866693 and described >> systemd-tmpfiles behavior look pretty wrong to me, but I am not sure how >> to fix it.

Re: [systemd-devel] PrivateTmp and systemd-tmpfiles

2012-10-17 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 17.10.12 14:16, Lukáš Nykrýn ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Hello, >> Today I have read this bug >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866693 and described >> systemd-tmpfiles behavior look pretty wrong to me, but I am

Re: [systemd-devel] PrivateTmp and systemd-tmpfiles

2012-10-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 17.10.12 14:16, Lukáš Nykrýn ([email protected]) wrote: > Hello, > Today I have read this bug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866693 and described > systemd-tmpfiles behavior look pretty wrong to me, but I am not sure how > to fix it. Some ideas cross my mind; moving systemd

[systemd-devel] PrivateTmp and systemd-tmpfiles

2012-10-17 Thread Lukáš Nykrýn
Hello, Today I have read this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866693 and described systemd-tmpfiles behavior look pretty wrong to me, but I am not sure how to fix it. Some ideas cross my mind; moving systemd-namespace-* elsewhere, adding some option to exclude dirs in tmpfiles conf