Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-29 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Lennart, I'm going to quickly top post here so forgive me for being rude. Serge and I worked out some patches that seem to address the devtmpfs issues nicely. Still got a few oddities to iron out but the big fundamental one got fixed and is working. Many thanks for that. The problem with error

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-29 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 26.10.12 18:39, Michael H. Warfield ([email protected]) wrote: > My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and > obfuscating errors in ways that makes debugging almost impossible. > Almost every upgrade problem I've had in Fedora has been related to > systemd's f

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:59:21AM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 10:05 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:39:33PM -0400, "Michael H. Warfield" > > wrote: > > > [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service > > > network.service - LSB: Bring

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 17:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:01:36PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Kay, Olav, I think that we're being a bit unfair towards > > Michael. There's an implication that his posts were offensive, but they > > weren't. Overly verbose,

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 10:05 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:39:33PM -0400, "Michael H. Warfield" > wrote: > > [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service > > network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking > > Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network) > >

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:01:36PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Kay, Olav, I think that we're being a bit unfair towards > Michael. There's an implication that his posts were offensive, but they > weren't. Overly verbose, yes, repetitive, yes, agitated, etc, but not > intended as rud

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Oleksii Shevchuk
> Odd, the oldest systemd version I have around is 38, and even that has a > working journal that catches stdout/stderr of services. There is some problem with systemctl status and stderr/stdout: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55320 This leads to such behavior: > cat ~/.config/syst

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Jon Stanley
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > Excuse me? I'm a kernel maintainer and a member of the Samba team. I > have dedicated almost 2 decades to promoting and developing several > dozen open source projects I will not enumerate here. I don't know or particularly care who

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 08:20:51AM -0400, "Michael H. Warfield" wrote: > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 10:03 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:39:33PM -0400, "Michael H. Warfield" > > wrote: > > > [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service > > > network.service - LSB: B

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 13:01 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:04:42AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Michael H. Warfield > > wrote: > > > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 05:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > >> sent too quickly.. > > >> >

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:04:42AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Michael H. Warfield > wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 05:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > >> sent too quickly.. > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 05:22:30AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > >> > On Fri, Oc

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Oleksii Shevchuk
> Ok fine... So I get logged in and I run this... > [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service > network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking > Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network) > Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:23:07 > +0400; 1min

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 05:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: >> sent too quickly.. >> >> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 05:22:30AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:16:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: >> > > BTW... No

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:39:33PM -0400, "Michael H. Warfield" wrote: > [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service > network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking > Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network) > Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 05:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > sent too quickly.. > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 05:22:30AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:16:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > > BTW... Not to drop names (which I'm about to do) or anything and I know > >

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Olav Vitters
sent too quickly.. On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 05:22:30AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:16:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > BTW... Not to drop names (which I'm about to do) or anything and I know > > in a big organization not everybody knows everyone but... > > I

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Olav Vitters
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:16:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > BTW... Not to drop names (which I'm about to do) or anything and I know > in a big organization not everybody knows everyone but... I prefer judging myself. And at the moment I see you using words like: - crap - POS -- R

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 22:05 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 21:50 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 18:32 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield > > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 21:50 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 18:32 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield > > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > > > > > >> This should help. Obviously, j

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 18:32 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield > wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > > > >> This should help. Obviously, journalctl should help you a lot as well. > > > > And journalctl gave me ja

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > >> This should help. Obviously, journalctl should help you a lot as well. > > And journalctl gave me jack shit trying to figure this out and I really > DON'T need yet another o

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > It's still failing and it's giving me conflicting errors about > "directory already exists" and then "file does not exist" (on the > directory). This POS is driving me nuts with lack of intelligent > debugging information! Throwing ta

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > This should help. Obviously, journalctl should help you a lot as well. And journalctl gave me jack shit trying to figure this out and I really DON'T need yet another obscure command to dig out errors that should have been presented in th

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 20:06 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Michael H. Warfield > > wrote: > > > My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and > > > obfuscating errors in

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Michael H. Warfield > wrote: > > My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and > > obfuscating errors in ways that makes debugging almost impossible. > > Almost every upgrade pr

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 27.10.2012 01:51, schrieb Kok: >> Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:23:07 >> +0400; 1min 57s ago > > hmm, EXIT CODE failure. It exited with a non-zero status. > >> Process: 91 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start (code=exited, >> status=209

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and > obfuscating errors in ways that makes debugging almost impossible. > Almost every upgrade problem I've had in Fedora has been related to > systemd's failure to p

[systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and obfuscating errors in ways that makes debugging almost impossible. Almost every upgrade problem I've had in Fedora has been related to systemd's failure to provide comprehendable error messages to things like errors in fstab (