On Wed, 11.09.13 20:04, Thomas Bächler ([email protected]) wrote:
> Am 11.09.2013 17:08, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > Using FsckPassNo= as a way to add that dep sucks really, because the
> > ordering it does is stupid and fsck can do the ordering internally
> > anyway these days...
>
> So,
Am 11.09.2013 17:08, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> Using FsckPassNo= as a way to add that dep sucks really, because the
> ordering it does is stupid and fsck can do the ordering internally
> anyway these days...
So, shouldn't systemd-fstab-generator omit that entirely, too? Instead,
every mount wi
On Wed, 21.08.13 19:55, Thomas Bächler ([email protected]) wrote:
> In the manpage for systemd.mount(5), the following section is included:
>
> COMPATIBILITY OPTIONS
>The following option is also available in the "[Mount]" section,
> but exists purely for compatibility reasons and shou
In the manpage for systemd.mount(5), the following section is included:
COMPATIBILITY OPTIONS
The following option is also available in the "[Mount]" section,
but exists purely for compatibility reasons and should not be used in
newly written mount files.
FsckPassNo=
The
