On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> We
> had the question of creating C libraries for wrapping D-Bus APIs in
> GNOME upstream a few years ago, and we all came to the conclusion that
> instead of writing those we should rather make the D-Bus python glue
> nicer. The result
On Tue, 22.01.13 08:43, George McCollister ([email protected]) wrote:
> Are there plans (or desire) to expand the Python module included
> with systemd beyond Journal? Is there desire to replicate or wrap
> functionality provided by the DBUS API or is this beyond the design
> scope of t
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:43 AM, George McCollister
wrote:
> Is there desire to replicate or wrap functionality provided by the DBUS API
> or is this beyond the design scope of this module?
I think it would be worthwhile to support Pythonic APIs for things
like what systemctl can do from the CLI.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> The package is stuctured so that it is possible to easily add new
> modules. Any new additions would have to be generally useful to be
> included in the main package. It's just that so far, no extensions
> have been proposed, so
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:43:07AM -0600, George McCollister wrote:
> Are there plans (or desire) to expand the Python module included
> with systemd beyond Journal? Is there desire to replicate or wrap
> functionality provided by the DBUS API or is this beyond the design
> scope of this module?
Hi
Are there plans (or desire) to expand the Python module included with
systemd beyond Journal? Is there desire to replicate or wrap
functionality provided by the DBUS API or is this beyond the design
scope of this module?
Regards,
George McCollister
_
