On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Nikos Platis wrote:
> The reason I was asking is that I was witnessing some problems with a
> service, which I could attribute to problems with (the syntax of?) the
> EnvironmentFile used.
>
> Using at least systemd 201 on Arch Linux, the (seemingly valid) file
> p
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Nikos Platis wrote:
> The reason I was asking is that I was witnessing some problems with a
> service, which I could attribute to problems with (the syntax of?) the
> EnvironmentFile used.
The syntax is fine. It's the parser that's buggy.
--
Mantas Mikulėnas
___
The reason I was asking is that I was witnessing some problems with a
service, which I could attribute to problems with (the syntax of?) the
EnvironmentFile used.
Using at least systemd 201 on Arch Linux, the (seemingly valid) file
provided by the package author would not work (some variables defi
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Nikos Platis wrote:
> I would like to ask if the syntax specification for files used as
> EnvironmentFile's is available somewhere. I have searched but could not find
> anything.
>
> Unfortunately, if you search around the Internet, you can find many issues
> with
В Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:56:02 +0300
Nikos Platis пишет:
> I would like to ask if the syntax specification for files used as
> EnvironmentFile's is available somewhere.
man systemd.exec
___
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
h
I would like to ask if the syntax specification for files used as
EnvironmentFile's is available somewhere. I have searched but could not
find anything.
Unfortunately, if you search around the Internet, you can find many issues
with these files' syntax: it is like Bash, but not exactly, it is not
