Re: [systemd-devel] Detecting failed units based on active state

2014-06-12 Thread David . Yates
> Lennart Poettering wrote on 11.06.2014 14:58:02: > > On Wed, 11.06.14 13:43, Mantas Mikulėnas ([email protected]) wrote: > > > Hmm, didn't this get fixed in recent versions? I seem to remember that > > after the sd-bus port systemd started sending changed_properties with > > values, not just

Re: [systemd-devel] Detecting failed units based on active state

2014-06-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 11.06.14 13:43, Mantas Mikulėnas ([email protected]) wrote: > Hmm, didn't this get fixed in recent versions? I seem to remember that > after the sd-bus port systemd started sending changed_properties with > values, not just invalidated_properties... This is indeed the case. In more recent

Re: [systemd-devel] Detecting failed units based on active state

2014-06-11 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
Hmm, didn't this get fixed in recent versions? I seem to remember that after the sd-bus port systemd started sending changed_properties with values, not just invalidated_properties... -- Mantas Mikulėnas // sent from phone On Jun 11, 2014 12:59 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > > > We have written a compon

[systemd-devel] Detecting failed units based on active state

2014-06-11 Thread David . Yates
Hi, We have written a component that detects failing units in the system. This registers for the PropertiesChanged signal, to be notified whenever the ActiveState of a unit changes. However this signal is sent without the property values. This can result in a problem when a unit is restarted