6 octobre 2018 14:22 "Lennart Poettering" a écrit:
> On Sa, 15.09.18 22:32, Baudouin Feildel ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> (Sorry for not responding more timely, I have been travelling and am
> still catching up with all the email)
No problem, we are all busy with tons of emails thos
<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: systemd-devel on behalf of
Lennart Poettering
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 1:38:37 PM
To: Jérémy Rosen
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Default on failure dependencies
On Mo, 08.10.18 09:58,
On Mo, 08.10.18 09:58, Jérémy Rosen ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> > This all makes me wonder whether a different approach to all of this
> > wouldn't be better: maybe we should just consider this a logging
> > problem: let's make sure we log a recognizable log message (i.e. a
> > structured
This all makes me wonder whether a different approach to all of this
wouldn't be better: maybe we should just consider this a logging
problem: let's make sure we log a recognizable log message (i.e. a
structured journal message with a well-defined MESSAGE_ID=) whenever a
service fails. With that
On Sa, 15.09.18 22:32, Baudouin Feildel ([email protected]) wrote:
(Sorry for not responding more timely, I have been travelling and am
still catching up with all the email)
> Hello there,
>
> Few weeks ago I opened the following issue in systemd repository:
> https://github.com/system
15 septembre 2018 22:32 "Baudouin Feildel" a
écrit:
> Hello there,
>
> Few weeks ago I opened the following issue in systemd repository:
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9373. Seeing no traction from
> existing systemd developer, I decided to give it a try and started
> working on th
Hello there,
Few weeks ago I opened the following issue in systemd repository:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9373. Seeing no traction from
existing systemd developer, I decided to give it a try and started
working on the feature I wanted in the following fork:
https://github.com/AMDG2/
