Hi
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> David Herrmann [2014-11-28 15:49 +0100]:
>> Why not fix all those other occurrences with one fix by changing
>> hostnamectl_main() the last line from:
>> return r < 0 ? EXIT_FAILURE : r;
>> to
>> return r < 0 ? EXIT_F
Hey David,
David Herrmann [2014-11-28 15:49 +0100]:
> Why not fix all those other occurrences with one fix by changing
> hostnamectl_main() the last line from:
> return r < 0 ? EXIT_FAILURE : r;
> to
> return r < 0 ? EXIT_FAILURE : 0;
>
> Usually, >=0 means success, <0 failure, in systemd
Hi
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> while packaging 217 my integration tests for hostnamed yelled at me
> that hostnamectl fails. Indeed it exits with 1 now even though it
> succeeds.
>
> Trivial patch attached. OK to push?
Why not fix all those other occurren
Hello all,
while packaging 217 my integration tests for hostnamed yelled at me
that hostnamectl fails. Indeed it exits with 1 now even though it
succeeds.
Trivial patch attached. OK to push?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubunt
