Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-resolved : How to change permanently to 127.0.0.54

2024-12-23 Thread Reto
On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 11:08:56AM +, Laura Smith wrote: > > I believe you can just remove the symlink at /etc/resolv.conf and > > replace it with a file that points to 127.0.0.54. > Thanks Daniel, that has been my work-around, a systemd timer checking for > 127.0.0.53 and doing a sed on /etc/

Re: [systemd-devel] Scan all USB devices from Linux service

2024-02-15 Thread Reto
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 05:56:31PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote: > This is what ChatGPT proposes: Can we like not... If people want to ask a generative AI they do so on their own. Let's keep responses based on human interaction shall we, rather than parroting math models.

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-resolved not working in a realistic scenario

2023-04-29 Thread Reto
b.com goes through wt0 to 5.6.7.8 > - all other domain goes to 8.8.8.8 > - and of course my search domains netbird.cloud a.com b.com You should have a look at https://systemd.io/RESOLVED-VPNS/ Essentially, you want to set up the routing only domains appropriately. Cheers, Reto

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Q: ConditionPathExists=

2019-06-05 Thread Reto
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 12:26:56PM +0200, Jetchko Jekov wrote: > Or you (@Reindl) can just fix it on your side and stop ranting and > imposing your world view on others. It *is* considered bad habit to reply to the original sender instead of the list. I mean, you must assume that people who read

Re: [systemd-devel] Kafka Service Fails: Status=200/CHDIR

2019-03-16 Thread Reto Brunner
Why on earth do you include pictures of text output? Please just attach the files / output themselves next time... ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] Monitoring whether all dependencies of a target are active

2016-08-26 Thread Reto Kaiser
Thanks for the gist, quite helpful! Regards, Reto On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Reto Kaiser wrote: >> >> Yes I was thinking to use "OnFailure". >> But I want to also detect stopped units, in case a

Re: [systemd-devel] Monitoring whether all dependencies of a target are active

2016-08-26 Thread Reto Kaiser
-dependencies". But since its output is not meant to be read by machines, I thought maybe there's a more machine-readable API. Regards, Reto > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:31:15 -0400 > From: Chris Morin > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [

[systemd-devel] Monitoring whether all dependencies of a target are active

2016-08-24 Thread Reto Kaiser
a more programmatic way of querying that information (without filtering those status "dots")? Thanks, Reto ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel