>
>
> However, I finally ditched it. I figured it will slow down boot of an
> aging system. Instead, I added bcache to my spinning rust plus an
> affordable SSD. This works very well and reduces boot times much better
> than readahead (by a factor of at least 5).
Perhaps such a feature is more us
What's the 2017 status of systemd-readahead..? Permanently dead?
-- grok.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
I'm wondering...
Has anyone yet invoked 'wayland' as being, in fact, a most diabolical
project... by which Lennart Poettering & Co. schemingly intend to take over
the GNUnix *graphics* universe, as well..?
:D
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@
I wonder if it's possible to discuss matters, in any list, without
everything coming out looking like an insult and/or a put-down...
:/
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Dark Penguin wrote:
> Now that systemd manages the shutdown procedure, I don't know if it's
> possible to achieve the sam
I don't know if URL links are acceptable on this list, but here's an
apropos one (since there is no separate user-only list):
Flatpak 0.6.10 Makes the Dependency on systemd in the User Session Optional:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/flatpak-0-6-10-makes-the-dependency-on-systemd-in-the-user-sess
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Pathangi Janardhanan
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What is the best option to do some debug/analysis of the system and the
> services started by systemd during initial bootup?
>
> I would like to use tools like perf and strace etc. on some of the
> services. I could do t
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:31 PM, lin webber wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> hello:
>> I have a question about systemd unit. I'm using ubuntu 16.04 whih
>> lightdm display manager . I have a service that I want to start it
>> completely before
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 11:01:07PM -0400, Che wrote:
> > From GitHub:
> >
> > "Support for snapshots has been removed."
>
> See //github.com/systemd/systemd/c
>From GitHub:
"Support for snapshots has been removed."
Has the back-story here been endlessly covered, here and elsewhere,
previously? And if so -- where would be the best place to read up on
understanding why it's no longer around in systemd..? Or perhaps someone
here will explain. Again, if ne
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
... However, systemd
> does not support natively to stop services by timer, currently. This
> means for the "systemctl stop" part you always have to explicitly
> invoke it.
Does it make sense to implement this as a feature? And if so,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
> Am 14.08.2016 um 14:29 schrieb Tom Browder:
>
> 3. If Debian 8 is running systemd for a service, why do I need an
>> entry for a service in init.d?
>>
>
> you don't
If I'm not mistaken, systemd is still referenced in /etc/init.d in Debi
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 28.07.16 17:52, Chip ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> > I see that my question re: issues with systemd, is more suited for non
> > development list.
> >
> > Is there a non development systemd list?
>
> There is none for now. Ju
12 matches
Mail list logo
