Re: [systemd-devel] systemd requires LFS?

2012-04-20 Thread Andreas Jaeger
d as off64_t? Or could this code just modified to remove the assert_cc and modify the parse_bytes function to use an uint64_t instead off off64_t? Don't do that, use the proper functions and types. Instead of the compile flag, a define to the source code is also an option and harder to ov

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 33

2011-08-03 Thread Andreas Jaeger
/logind.c:1179: undefined reference to `logind_gperf_lookup' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [systemd-logind] Error 1 It worked after I added gperf to the build environment. Is gperf now required or is the check for existance of gperf ignored? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Progr

[systemd-devel] common RPM spec file?

2011-07-28 Thread Andreas Jaeger
systemd at build time, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint

[systemd-devel] Fwd: Re: [opensuse-packaging] Fwd: [RFC] Preset Files

2011-07-11 Thread Andreas Jaeger
if enabled or disabled should win if both exist - but this issue exists in all proposals I've seen until now. It's probably something that should be (or already is) hardcoded in systemd. Regards, Christian Boltz - -- Andreas Jaeger, Progra

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC] Preset Files

2011-07-11 Thread Andreas Jaeger
ystemd/system.preset/ and > override the vendor/spin settings. So, how is this handled? As soon as I put one file in /etc/systemd/system.preset, is then everything in /lib/systemd/system.preset/ ignored? Or is there some kind of merge happening? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager op

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC] Preset Files

2011-07-06 Thread Andreas Jaeger
is or other policies. This also allows to ship different policies in - perhaps - conflicting packages, e.g. a (specific) server or a desktop preset. Good idea, you have my vote ;). But let me send this to the opensuse-packaging mailing list to ask for additional comments. Thanks for a well-thought

Re: [systemd-devel] Question on os-release

2011-06-16 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:43:01 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 16.06.11 11:58, Andreas Jaeger ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > > VERSION_ID -- usually plain version numbers have no spaces like > > > > > 3.4beta7, or 3.4-rc3 to make it ea

Re: [systemd-devel] Question on os-release

2011-06-16 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 09:08:20 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 30.05.11 15:00, Andreas Jaeger ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Monday, May 30, 2011 14:54:54 Kay Sievers wrote: > > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:20, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > > Looking at

Re: [systemd-devel] Question on os-release

2011-05-30 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On Monday, May 30, 2011 14:54:54 Kay Sievers wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:20, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > Looking at the os-release information, I wonder how to encode in the best > > way the Beta or Milestone versions of a product, e.g. "openSUSE 12.1 > > Milesto

[systemd-devel] Question on os-release

2011-05-30 Thread Andreas Jaeger
" Or is there some other logic intented to for these? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE aj@{novell.com,suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend

Re: [systemd-devel] [email protected] and [email protected]

2010-11-11 Thread Andreas Jaeger
uld handle services with dynamic ports. For details see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652608 Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE, a...@{novell.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-remount-api-vfs fails for me

2010-11-11 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On Thursday 11 November 2010 11:01:21 Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:34, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > I noticed for some time that systemd-remount-api-vfs is in the failed > > state and found now the following in the log files > > > > <4>[

[systemd-devel] systemd-remount-api-vfs fails for me

2010-11-11 Thread Andreas Jaeger
n process exited, code=exited, status=1 <4>[4.634045] systemd[1]: Unit systemd-remount-api-vfs.service entered failed state. My fstab contains: usbfs/proc/bus/usbusbfs noauto 0 0 What's wrong? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Explain structure of tmpfiles.d

2010-11-11 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 23:59:26 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 04.11.10 11:30, Andreas Jaeger ([email protected]) wrote: > > IMO we should add an easy reference of the structure of tmpfiles.d files. > > Here's a patch, > > I'd prefer not to maintain dup

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Explain structure of tmpfiles.d

2010-11-04 Thread Andreas Jaeger
IMO we should add an easy reference of the structure of tmpfiles.d files. Here's a patch, Andreas From: Andreas Jaeger Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:26:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Explain structure of file. --- tmpfiles.d/systemd.conf | 11 +++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(

[systemd-devel] Fix typo in comment

2010-09-28 Thread Andreas Jaeger
Just noticed the following while reading the git diff, Andreas >From 5a4689ef2a875f2d50f7691b03d7675180542d9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Jaeger Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:46:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix comment --- src/tmpfiles.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+)