Re: [systemd-devel] detaching existing extensions with new systemd extension attach

2024-11-27 Thread serenissi
What is the usecase for this? sysexts are extensions to /usr (and /opt). Services don't write to /usr usually (extensions are usually read only too). Anything being read is opened as a fd which survives the unmount-mount operation. I can't think of any reason a service would want to "lock" /usr

[systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 257-rc3

2024-11-27 Thread systemd tag bot
A new systemd ☠️ pre-release ☠️ has just been tagged. Please download the tarball here: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/archive/v257-rc3.tar.gz NOTE: This is ☠️ pre-release ☠️ software. Do not run this on production systems, but please test this and report any issues you find to GitHu

[systemd-devel] systemd and varlink

2024-11-27 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
Hello systemd, We are closely observing the varlink development and excited about it. Our guys who were at the all systems go conference mentioned that the Resolver is not part of the systemd family. Ref: Resolver (https://varlink.org/) . What is the upstream’s thoughts regarding service discov

[systemd-devel] detaching existing extensions with new systemd extension attach

2024-11-27 Thread Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
Hello systemd, We are looking into systemd system extensions for quick patching our immutable images while we are updating and rolling out the patched immutable image. One thing that is stated in the documentation is that before attaching a new extension, all previous extensions are deattached

Re: [systemd-devel] stop service in 3 steps

2024-11-27 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 26.11.24 12:06, Georg Müller (georgmuel...@gmx.net) wrote: > Hi all, > > I am currently trying to set up a 3-step kill mode for an application and > this seems not possible with systemd. > > Here is the scenario I a trying to achieve: > > * on 'systemctl stop ...', the service should recei

Re: [systemd-devel] generators, private /tmp

2024-11-27 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 27.11.24 02:18, James Muir (jamesmui) (james...@cisco.com) wrote: > > > Thanks for your reply. > > > > > > Is my second statement also correct? > > > > > > i.e. is there no way to prevent mounting a private /tmp when executing > > > generators using something like an environment variable o