Re: [systemd-devel] why systemd-boot (seems as everyone else) does not check the signatures of initramfs?

2023-05-26 Thread Felix Rubio
Hi Lennart, I remember having read some time ago that UKI could pose problems with early-boot modules provided by vendors and so. But... let's give it a try! Then, the process should be: 1. Install a version of shim signed with MS keys. 2. Generate the UKI 3. rename the UKI image to grubx64.e

Re: [systemd-devel] udev rule, continue to next rule only if preb failed

2023-05-26 Thread daggs
Greetings, > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 at 12:02 PM > From: "daggs" > To: "Lennart Poettering" > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] udev rule, continue to next rule only if preb > failed > > Greetings Lennart, > > > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 at 11:23 AM > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Monotonic time went backwards, rotating log

2023-05-26 Thread Phillip Susi
Lennart Poettering writes: > It actually checks that first: > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/src/libsystemd/sd-journal/journal-file.c#L2201 That's what I'm saying: it should have noticed that FIRST and not gotten to the monotonic time check, but it didn't.

Re: [systemd-devel] udev rule, continue to next rule only if preb failed

2023-05-26 Thread daggs
Greetings Lennart, > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 at 11:23 AM > From: "Lennart Poettering" > To: "daggs" > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] udev rule, continue to next rule only if preb > failed > > On Do, 25.05.23 20:25, daggs ([email protected]) wrote: > > > Gr

Re: [systemd-devel] Monotonic time went backwards, rotating log

2023-05-26 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 25.05.23 14:32, Phillip Susi ([email protected]) wrote: > > Lennart Poettering writes: > > > We want that within each file all records are strictly ordered by all > > clocks, so that we can find specific entries via bisection. > > Why *all* clocks? Even if you want to search on the monot

Re: [systemd-devel] udev rule, continue to next rule only if preb failed

2023-05-26 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 25.05.23 20:25, daggs ([email protected]) wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm trying to implement the following behavior: > if a usb is added ot removed, run a script before all other existing rules > but continue to existing iff the script failed > I've added the following rule to /etc/udev/rules.d/5