[systemd-devel] Nonstandard port for systemd-resolved DNS forwarded queries

2019-07-03 Thread jimc
Version: systemd-242-2.2.x86_64, dnsmasq-2.80-4.1.x86_64, bind-9.11.2-44.3.x86_64, avahi-0.7-7.3.x86_64 from OpenSuSE Tumbleweed. Here's my use case: There's a master directory server, two slaves, and a bunch of leaf nodes. All support IPv4 and IPv6. All the Linux boxes run systemd and systemd-

Re: [systemd-devel] Logged timestamps for service do not report correct times

2019-07-03 Thread Sam Gilson
Thank you for the response! I don't think I did a great job asking an actual question in my last email, so let me clarify. What I am currently trying to understand is what the differences between how and when the different timestamps for each service are logged. The confusion comes from the fa

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Startup single step

2019-07-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.07.19 um 11:59 schrieb Ulrich Windl: > Well an actual fact: I upgraded a system yesterday, and I spend about eight > reboots and about 5 hours just to find out WHY systemd booted into an > emergency > shell. Compared to the old init I would have found and fixed that in one boot > I > gues

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.07.19 um 11:53 schrieb Ulrich Windl: > I agree that the major problem with systemd was that distributions switched 3 > or 5 years too early to it. guess where you would be now without them solving most fo the problems over the past years for people coming like you late to the party guess

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.07.19 um 08:37 schrieb Ulrich Windl: > The really annoying thing with systemd is that if SOMETHING fails during boot, > the complete boot is aborted and you are put into an emergency shell. this is not true there are very rare cases where you end in the emergency shell > with the fact th

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 03.07.19 08:37, Ulrich Windl ([email protected]) wrote: > >> I agree here. While we do have `support-url` which distros can > >> override, Apparently not all of them do. > >> We could probably change our build system, that `support-url` needs to > >> be set explicitly and if

Re: [systemd-devel] Startup single step

2019-07-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 02.07.19 12:30, Jay Burger ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi, > > I am curious if there is a way to single step through the systemd startup > of services? So this exists, in theory in systemd.confirm_spawn= on the kernel cmdline. But it's not without pitfalls. In particular, some dis

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Startup single step

2019-07-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 03.07.19 11:59, Ulrich Windl ([email protected]) wrote: > > Thank you for understanding, > > OK, I'll write a positive message about systemd: "Great, it made me spend > several hours to find and fix boot problems, where without systemd I would had > just idle time. A great i

[systemd-devel] Problem in understanding container permissions

2019-07-03 Thread Kai Bojens
Ubuntu 18.04, HWE kernel 4.18.0-25-generic, systemd 237-3ubuntu10.23 I have created a nspawn container with a minimal Ubuntu and booted the container without any problems. There were no problems and I used the default settings. Now I see some strange permission errors which I can't explain: Insi

[systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Startup single step

2019-07-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 03.07.2019 um 11:01 in Nachricht <20190703090130.GB12011@gardel-login>: > On Mi, 03.07.19 08:42, Ulrich Windl ([email protected]‑regensburg.de) wrote: > >> >>> Jay Burger schrieb am 02.07.2019 um 19:30 in >> Nachricht : >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am curious if there

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> František Šumšal schrieb am 03.07.2019 um 11:01 in Nachricht : [...] > Honestly, I'm kind of impressed you stamp the "bad bad systemd" phrase all > over > the place several times in your emails, yet you still expect people to be > able > to (willingly) help you. I may have an opinion, just

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Anybody care to fix the list processor?

2019-07-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mo, 01.07.19 17:03, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote: > On Mon, 01 Jul 2019 08:20:23 +0200 > "Ulrich Windl" wrote: > > >>> Simon McVittie schrieb am 11.06.2019 um > > >>> 16:29 in Nachricht > > <20190611142939.GA6676@horizon>: > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 15:44:07 +0200,

Re: [systemd-devel] Logged timestamps for service do not report correct times

2019-07-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 26.06.19 16:30, Sam Gilson ([email protected]) wrote: > Hey everyone, I've got a quick question about how the timestamps > that are gathered by systemctl are emitted by systemd. My > organization has a service that runs fairly early in boot (timestamp > X ), it has DHCP to an internal

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 02.07.19 18:51, František Šumšal ([email protected]) wrote: > > > On 7/2/19 4:36 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Am Di., 2. Juli 2019 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb Paul Menzel > > : > >> Reading the output above, I can see, why the people contact this mailing > >> list. > > > > I agree here. While we

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Startup single step

2019-07-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 03.07.19 08:42, Ulrich Windl ([email protected]) wrote: > >>> Jay Burger schrieb am 02.07.2019 um 19:30 in > Nachricht : > > Hi, > > > > I am curious if there is a way to single step through the systemd startup > > of services? I don't find any such feature and am curious w

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-03 Thread František Šumšal
On 7/3/19 8:37 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: František Šumšal schrieb am 02.07.2019 um 18:51 in > Nachricht : > >> >> On 7/2/19 4:36 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Am Di., 2. Juli 2019 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb Paul Menzel >>> : Reading the output above, I can see, why the people contact this mailin

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service: ... Unknown user '1019'

2019-07-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 03.07.19 09:07, Ulrich Windl ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi! > > I'm having a problem created by systemd: A temporary directory is to > be created that is owned by a user found in LDAP. However as all > temporary directories are created way before networking is > available

[systemd-devel] systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service: ... Unknown user '1019'

2019-07-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! I'm having a problem created by systemd: A temporary directory is to be created that is owned by a user found in LDAP. However as all temporary directories are created way before networking is available, I cannot user the user name, nor can systemd delay creating that directory after networ