[systemd-devel] Where to send replies to? (Was: Q: ConditionPathExists=)

2019-06-05 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Reto schrieb am 06.06.2019 um 06:16 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 12:26:56PM +0200, Jetchko Jekov wrote: >> Or you (@Reindl) can just fix it on your side and stop ranting and >> imposing your world view on others. > > It *is* con

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Q: ConditionPathExists=

2019-06-05 Thread Reto
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 12:26:56PM +0200, Jetchko Jekov wrote: > Or you (@Reindl) can just fix it on your side and stop ranting and > imposing your world view on others. It *is* considered bad habit to reply to the original sender instead of the list. I mean, you must assume that people who read

Re: [systemd-devel] User question: how to manage an application split up into multiple binaries The Right Way.

2019-06-05 Thread Etienne Doms
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 10:56, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 05.06.19 um 10:34 schrieb Etienne Doms: > > Hi all, > > > > We are developing an application on an embedded system which, for some > > reasons, must be split up into multiple processes. All these processes > > are linked between each oth

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Q: ConditionPathExists=

2019-06-05 Thread Jetchko Jekov
Or you (@Reindl) can just fix it on your side and stop ranting and imposing your world view on others. On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 11:40 AM wrote: > > On Wed, 05 Jun 2019 09:11:36 +0200 > "Ulrich Windl" wrote: > > >>> Reindl Harald schrieb am 04.06.2019 um > > >>> 14:23 in > > Nachricht <4e4bc6ca-2

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Q: ConditionPathExists=

2019-06-05 Thread systemd
On Wed, 05 Jun 2019 09:11:36 +0200 "Ulrich Windl" wrote: > >>> Reindl Harald schrieb am 04.06.2019 um > >>> 14:23 in > Nachricht <[email protected]>: > > > > > Am 04.06.19 um 14:17 schrieb Ulrich Windl: > [...] > > BTW: can you please only reply to the list

Re: [systemd-devel] User question: how to manage an application split up into multiple binaries The Right Way.

2019-06-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.06.19 um 10:34 schrieb Etienne Doms: > Hi all, > > We are developing an application on an embedded system which, for some > reasons, must be split up into multiple processes. All these processes > are linked between each other, they communicate using named pipes, and > all of them should b

[systemd-devel] User question: how to manage an application split up into multiple binaries The Right Way.

2019-06-05 Thread Etienne Doms
Hi all, We are developing an application on an embedded system which, for some reasons, must be split up into multiple processes. All these processes are linked between each other, they communicate using named pipes, and all of them should be considered as a single entity materializing the applica

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Q: ConditionPathExists=

2019-06-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.06.19 um 09:29 schrieb Michael Chapman: > On Wed, 5 Jun 2019, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Reindl Harald schrieb am 04.06.2019 um 14:23 in >> Nachricht <[email protected]>: >> >>> >>> Am 04.06.19 um 14:17 schrieb Ulrich Windl: >> [...] >>> BTW: can you please

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Q: ConditionPathExists=

2019-06-05 Thread Michael Chapman
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Reindl Harald schrieb am 04.06.2019 um 14:23 in > Nachricht <[email protected]>: > > > > > Am 04.06.19 um 14:17 schrieb Ulrich Windl: > [...] > > BTW: can you please only reply to the list instead reply all, your > >

[systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Q: ConditionPathExists=

2019-06-05 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Reindl Harald schrieb am 04.06.2019 um 14:23 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > > Am 04.06.19 um 14:17 schrieb Ulrich Windl: [...] > BTW: can you please only reply to the list instead reply all, your > offlist copy is typically faster which leads in automati