Re: [systemd-devel] help me

2018-10-09 Thread Reindl Harald
you are simply wrong here and should blame your distribution for such an old systemd which still links to the devel mailing list just because a random service fails in case of "Failed to start Tracker metadata" systemd is only the messenger Am 10.10.18 um 00:33 schrieb [email protected]: > sal

Re: [systemd-devel] Where the pid=1 limits come from when using systemd

2018-10-09 Thread Jeffrey Zhang
After some search, i guess the pid=1 limits come from the nr_open now and the default nr_open come from linux code[0]. So there should be no way to change the pid=1 limit unless you re-compile your kernel with some code change. [0] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/file.c#L22-L27

[systemd-devel] reliable way to check if udev is ready to serve requests

2018-10-09 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, is there a reliable way to check from a shell script that udevd is running and able to serve request? Say you want to run "udevadm trigger" but only if udevd is actually able to process that request. There is a udev_ctrl_send_ping() function, which looks like it could be perhaps used for thos

Re: [systemd-devel] Where the pid=1 limits come from when using systemd

2018-10-09 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 09.10.18 13:40, Jeffrey Zhang ([email protected]) wrote: > Thanks Richard, > > That explains why archlinux NOFILE is 1048576. archlinux is using systemd > 239.2-1 > > But it still can not explain where the pid=1 process limits come from? is > there any way to change it? systemd whe

Re: [systemd-devel] Default on failure dependencies

2018-10-09 Thread Baudouin Feildel
6 octobre 2018 14:22 "Lennart Poettering" a écrit: > On Sa, 15.09.18 22:32, Baudouin Feildel ([email protected]) wrote: > > (Sorry for not responding more timely, I have been travelling and am > still catching up with all the email) No problem, we are all busy with tons of emails thos