Hello Zbigniew,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> systemd-238 has been tagged.
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/archive/v238/systemd-238.tar.gz
>
> CHANGES WITH 238:
>
> * The MemoryAccounting= unit property now defaults to on. After
>
On Mo, 05.03.18 16:19, Oliver Neukum ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 10:18 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > But why wouldn't that be a kernel option? I mean, so far the goal was
> > to encode "reasonable defaults" in the kernel itself, so that
> > userspace is only used wh
I am running some inetd firewall components that came from the legacy FWTK
(http://fwtk.org) under systemd socket activation on Oracle Linux 7.4.
The author of this code has found bugs in later life.
http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/editorials/codetools/index.html
When I was usin
Hi Zbyszek,
Thank you for your explanation.
However, I found that Conflicts= will be a good choice for me:
# /etc/systemd/system/my-apps-start.target
[Unit]
Wants=docker.service sshd.service mongodb.service
# /etc/systemd/system/my-apps-stop.target
[Unit]
Conflicts=docke
Am 2018-03-08 um 07:03 schrieb Andrei Borzenkov:
> 08.03.2018 02:37, Jakob Schürz пишет:
[...]
>
> This is apparently wrong, because service briefly goes via "failed"
> state every time it fails. It is true that if Restart= is set it
> immediately follows by "activating" state again, but OnFailu
Hi All,
I'd like to know if systemd community thinks that adding support for
relative values in configuration is a good idea.
I found a related patch and discussion in
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-May/032191.html.
Quoting from the comments:
"""
I'd always keep
Hi All,
I'd like to know if systemd community thinks that adding support for
relative values in configuration is a good idea.
I found a related patch and discussion in
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-May/032191.html.
Quoting from the comments:
"""
I'd always keep
