On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 12:31:14PM +, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> Hello Jason,
>
> Just wanted to remind you that clients set a timeout for the method reply.
> Don't remember off the top of my head but different implementations have
> different default timeouts. Consider this when delaying
On Mon, 03.07.17 16:28, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.07.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > On Mon, 03.07.17 16:12, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
> >
> > > Am 03.07.2017 um 15:59 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > > > On Mon, 03.07.17 15:53, R
On Mon, 03.07.17 16:12, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
> Am 03.07.2017 um 15:59 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > On Mon, 03.07.17 15:53, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
> >
> > > Jul 3 15:48:01 backup-arrakis systemd: named.service: Failed at step
> > > NAMESPACE spawn
Am 03.07.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Mon, 03.07.17 16:12, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
Am 03.07.2017 um 15:59 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Mon, 03.07.17 15:53, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
Jul 3 15:48:01 backup-arrakis systemd: named.ser
Am 03.07.2017 um 15:59 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Mon, 03.07.17 15:53, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
Jul 3 15:48:01 backup-arrakis systemd: named.service: Failed at step
NAMESPACE spawning /usr/libexec/setup-named-chroot.sh: No such file or
directory
by all repsect, this
On Mon, 03.07.17 15:53, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote:
> Jul 3 15:48:01 backup-arrakis systemd: named.service: Failed at step
> NAMESPACE spawning /usr/libexec/setup-named-chroot.sh: No such file or
> directory
>
> by all repsect, this output is completly nonsense when the reason i
Jul 3 15:48:01 backup-arrakis systemd: named.service: Failed at step
NAMESPACE spawning /usr/libexec/setup-named-chroot.sh: No such file or
directory
by all repsect, this output is completly nonsense when the reason is
some "InaccessibleDirectories" no longer exists and is not prefixed with
a
Hello Jason,
Just wanted to remind you that clients set a timeout for the method reply.
Don't remember off the top of my head but different implementations have
different default timeouts. Consider this when delaying the reply.
Umut
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:36 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> O
On Thu, 29.06.17 21:55, Jason Litzinger ([email protected]) wrote:
> > machined has easier-to-follow uses of this, as it does some operations
> > that might take a bit longer, such as cloning or removing images.
> Thanks!
>
> Since I'll be going through this to come up with something for my
On Thu, 29.06.17 11:51, Oliver Neukum ([email protected]) wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 29.06.2017, 11:45 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> >
> > Am 29.06.2017 um 10:05 schrieb Oliver Neukum:
> > >
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 28.06.2017, 13:29 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > > >
> > > > Well, it's a
10 matches
Mail list logo