Hi all,
I have a question about `systemd-nspawn` internals.
When creating the child process, it does something like:
parent
|
clone(MOUNT)
| `,
| outer_child()
| |
| clone(rest)
|
On Wed, 31 May 2017 04:33:09 -0400,
Pietro Paolini wrote:
> Thanks! Unfortunately it is not an option to install the Go runtime
> system on the board I am working with, is there a place where I can
> find docs about writing my own wrapper in C ?
Go is a compiled language, there is no separate runt
FYI:
I tried to simply bypass the pending job check:
+int ignore_stop_pending = true;
static void socket_enter_running(Socket *s, int cfd) {
...
-if (unit_stop_pending(UNIT(s))) {
+if (!ignore_stop_pending && unit_stop_pending(UNIT(s))) {
But, as expected, it's not as that easy - t
On Wed, 31.05.17 11:21, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
> Hello.
>
> My laptop does spuriously wake up from suspend.
> Can systemd be involved in this? I do not know any timer set to use a
> wake alarm, but I may be wrong. I usually suspend by closing a lid, and
> logind re
Surface Pro 3 is a typical platform where suspend/resume loop problem
can be seen.
The problem is due to a systemd 229 bug:
1. "ignore": always can trigger endless suspend/resume loop
2. "open": sometimes suspend/resume loop can be stopped
3. "method": always can trigger endless susped/resume loop
This patch adds a parameter to acpi_lid_notify_state() so that it can act
differently against BIOS notification and kernel faked events.
Cc:
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires
Cc: Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng
---
drivers/acpi/button.c | 14 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 dele
Hello.
My laptop does spuriously wake up from suspend.
Can systemd be involved in this? I do not know any timer set to use a
wake alarm, but I may be wrong. I usually suspend by closing a lid, and
logind reports lid opened after wake up, but I do not know if it is just
because lid was clos
Hi,
> From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin
> Tissoires
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] ACPI: button: Add indication of BIOS
> notification and faked events
>
> Hi Lv,
>
> On May 27 2017 or thereabouts, Lv Zheng wrote:
> > Th
On 31 May 2017 at 02:36, Luke Shumaker wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2017 11:57:00 -0400,
> Pietro Paolini wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I am trying to configure my systemd to run my service *after* the
> > timesyncd service is synchronized with the NTP server, unfortunately
> > adding the "After=ti
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> This is indeed a shortcoming in systemd's model right now: we don't
> permit a start and a stop job to be enqueued for the same unit at the
> same time. But to do what you want to do we'd need to permit that: the
> service is supposed t
10 matches
Mail list logo
