FYI the file system folks are discussing this. It is not just a
problem with XFS it can affect ext4 too. And it's far from clear the
fs folks have a solution that won't cause worse problems.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg111058.html
Chris Murphy
_
Please don't top-post. Also try no to spam the mailing list with
multiple messages…
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:09:08PM +0200, Pascal wrote:
> and I'm running/testing on version 232
>
> 2017-05-19 16:06 GMT+02:00 Pascal :
>
> > note that it's about version 210 (year 2014)
> >
> > 2017-05-19 16:04
hi Lennart,
I read this on https://coreos.com/blog/intro-to-systemd-networkd.html :
*"Also, we should note that networkd is only made aware of new network
devices after udev has applied its low-level settings to them, so we can
safely match on the new MACAddress and Name that udev has set for our
note that it's about version 210 (year 2014)
2017-05-19 16:04 GMT+02:00 Pascal :
> hi Lennart,
>
> I read this on https://coreos.com/blog/intro-to-systemd-networkd.html :
>
> *"Also, we should note that networkd is only made aware of new network
> devices after udev has applied its low-level sett
and I'm running/testing on version 232
2017-05-19 16:06 GMT+02:00 Pascal :
> note that it's about version 210 (year 2014)
>
> 2017-05-19 16:04 GMT+02:00 Pascal :
>
>> hi Lennart,
>>
>> I read this on https://coreos.com/blog/intro-to-systemd-networkd.html :
>>
>> *"Also, we should note that networ
On Fri, 19.05.17 09:02, Pascal ([email protected]) wrote:
> is udev responsible for linking the system with the hardware?
> in this case, why does renaming not take place at the very first level ?
> which would make new name available for all other levels...
renaming takes place as part of the
On Thu, 18.05.17 23:51, Pascal ([email protected]) wrote:
> hi,
>
> I rename my network cards (with udev rule or systemd .link file) in order
> to use their new name everywhere else: sysctl, systemd-networkd, samba,
> iptables, etc ...
>
> unfortunately, sysctl and systemd-networkd are started
is udev responsible for linking the system with the hardware?
in this case, why does renaming not take place at the very first level ?
which would make new name available for all other levels...
hardware detected (plugged or in place) :
~> udev :
~> rename with defined rule (or not) :
