Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering (apt) timer services to not run at the same time

2017-04-27 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Now, we seem to be missing one bit: If daily-upgrade is already > running, and daily is about to start, daily should wait for > daily-upgrade to finish. I had hoped that maybe that works > automatically given that there is some orderi

Re: [systemd-devel] Should automount units for network filesystems be Before=local-fs.target?

2017-04-27 Thread Michael Chapman
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:53:51 +1000, Michael Chapman wrote: Hello all, At present, when systemd-fstab-generator creates an automount unit for an fstab entry, it applies the dependencies that would have been put into the mount unit into the automount un

Re: [systemd-devel] Should automount units for network filesystems be Before=local-fs.target?

2017-04-27 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:53:51 +1000, Michael Chapman wrote: > Hello all, > > At present, when systemd-fstab-generator creates an automount unit for > an fstab entry, it applies the dependencies that would have been put > into the mount unit into the automount unit instead. > > For a local filesys

Re: [systemd-devel] Ordering (apt) timer services to not run at the same time

2017-04-27 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:30:35PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Hi systemd folks, > > (service and timer files being discussed at the bottom) > > we are currently reworking the way automatic updates and upgrades work > on Ubuntu and Debian systems. We basically have two persistent timers >

[systemd-devel] Ordering (apt) timer services to not run at the same time

2017-04-27 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hi systemd folks, (service and timer files being discussed at the bottom) we are currently reworking the way automatic updates and upgrades work on Ubuntu and Debian systems. We basically have two persistent timers with associated services: 1. apt-daily - Downloads new lists and packages 2. apt-

Re: [systemd-devel] fully volatile running from ram

2017-04-27 Thread jr
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 04:08:21PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 25.04.17 13:13, jr (darwinsker...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > hello, > > > > in a fully-volatile boot scenario /usr from a physical disk gets mounted on > > top of an instance of a tmpfs. my first question is why is that ne

[systemd-devel] ANN: CI now tests meson and rebases

2017-04-27 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello all, quick announcement for things to watch out for in PR integration tests. After Zbigniew's meson build system work landed two days ago [1], I now set up our CI so that the "xenial-s390x" test builds using meson, while i386 and amd64 continue to run the classic autotools build. I initiall

Re: [systemd-devel] Should automount units for network filesystems be Before=local-fs.target?

2017-04-27 Thread Martin Wilck
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 15:53 +1000, Michael Chapman wrote: > Hello all, > > At present, when systemd-fstab-generator creates an automount unit > for an  > fstab entry, it applies the dependencies that would have been put > into the  > mount unit into the automount unit instead. > > For a local fil

Re: [systemd-devel] unable to create bridge name "default"

2017-04-27 Thread William Tu
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sat, 11.03.17 08:41, William Tu (u9012...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm not sure if this is caused by systemd-udev, apology if it's not >> the right place. When doing >> # brctl addbr default >> add bridge failed: Invalid argument