Re: [systemd-devel] hibernation sometimes not working

25.04.2017 04:45, Michał Zegan пишет: > Hello. > > I have archlinux with systemd (currently the newest released). > Hibernation works properly in this computer. however, after few > hibernations (or maybe something else triggers this condition?) it > suddenly stops working. trying to do systemctl

[systemd-devel] Activation socket overwritten while socket service running

Hi Folks, I ran into an issue when doing local development on Avahi where after the following sequence of events I could no longer connect to /run/avahi-daemon/socket activated by avahi-daemon.socket (1) systemctl disable avahi-daemon.service (2) systemctl stop avahi-daemon.service (2) sudo

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --session instance?

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 08:09:00PM +, Benno Fünfstück wrote: > Thank you Lennart for taking the time to answer my question. It does make > sense that you wouldn't want to support multiple sessions in big desktop > environments like Gnome or KDE or any complex software. > > However, it seems to

[systemd-devel] hibernation sometimes not working

Hello. I have archlinux with systemd (currently the newest released). Hibernation works properly in this computer. however, after few hibernations (or maybe something else triggers this condition?) it suddenly stops working. trying to do systemctl hibernate in the terminal says something like unkn

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --session instance?

Thank you Lennart for taking the time to answer my question. It does make sense that you wouldn't want to support multiple sessions in big desktop environments like Gnome or KDE or any complex software. However, it seems to me that there would be quite some usecases that fall outside these where m

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd --session instance?

On Sat, 22.04.17 14:07, Benno Fünfstück ([email protected]) wrote: > Hello list, > > currenty, systemd runs a system instance and a per-user one. However, > sometimes it would be nice to have a per-session instance, for example for > users of lightweight desktop environments that don't

Re: [systemd-devel] journal fragmentation on Btrfs

On Sat, 22.04.17 15:29, Andrei Borzenkov ([email protected]) wrote: > 18.04.2017 07:27, Chris Murphy пишет: > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Andrei Borzenkov > > wrote: > >> 18.04.2017 06:50, Chris Murphy пишет: > > > What exactly "changes" mean? Write() syscall? > >>> > >>> filefra

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 16:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > > > Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, it seems that the interfaces > > > > > reported by > > > > > sd-bus should match what gdbus does? (assuming, of course, > > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd integration

On Sat, 22.04.17 14:52, Reindl Harald ([email protected]) wrote: > > > Am 22.04.2017 um 13:28 schrieb John Doe: > > Free and Open-Source (FOSS > > ) > > operating systems > > without systemd > > > > http://without-systemd.

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-bus: ObjectManager difference with gdbus

On Fri, 21.04.17 13:22, David Herrmann ([email protected]) wrote: > >>> Anyway, gdbus bugs aside, it seems that the interfaces reported by > >>> sd-bus should match what gdbus does? (assuming, of course, that gdbus > >>> can be considered the "reference" implementation). > >> > >>Does the appe