Re: [systemd-devel] journal fragmentation on Btrfs

22.04.2017 15:29, Andrei Borzenkov пишет: > 18.04.2017 07:27, Chris Murphy пишет: >> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Andrei Borzenkov >> wrote: >>> 18.04.2017 06:50, Chris Murphy пишет: >> > What exactly "changes" mean? Write() syscall? filefrag reported entries increase, it's usi

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd integration

Am 22.04.2017 um 18:05 schrieb Sławomir Lach: Sorry, but in my opinion shell scripts are more understable than program in C it's nonsense to compare the shell scripts with systemd sourcecode, you have to compare them with systemd unit-files which are far easier and not a rough mix of config

[systemd-devel] Systemd --session instance?

Hello list, currenty, systemd runs a system instance and a per-user one. However, sometimes it would be nice to have a per-session instance, for example for users of lightweight desktop environments that don't have their own service manager. Then you could use systemd to spawn things like panels o

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd integration

Am 22.04.2017 um 13:28 schrieb John Doe: Free and Open-Source (FOSS ) operating systems without systemd http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page and who cares about the "i love my decades old mess of unpredictable

Re: [systemd-devel] journal fragmentation on Btrfs

18.04.2017 07:27, Chris Murphy пишет: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Andrei Borzenkov > wrote: >> 18.04.2017 06:50, Chris Murphy пишет: > What exactly "changes" mean? Write() syscall? >>> >>> filefrag reported entries increase, it's using FIEMAP. >>> >> >> So far it sounds like btrfs a

[systemd-devel] systemd integration

Free and Open-Source (FOSS) operating systems without systemd http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page ___ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel